Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, R.R.
Right arrow Articles by McKENNA, M.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, R.R.
Right arrow Articles by McKENNA, M.J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1981 Oxford University Press

research-article

Inhalation Toxicity of Acrylic AcidA

R.R. MILLER, J.A. AYRES, G.C. JERSEYB and M.J. McKENNA

Toxicology Research Laboratory, Health and Environmental Sciences USA, Dow Chemical U.S.A., Midland, MI 48640

Inhalation Toxicity of Acrylic Acid. Miller, R.R., Ayers, J.A., Jersey, G.C. and McKenna, M.J.(l98l).Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1:271–277. Male and female Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice were exposed to 0,5,25 or 75 ppm acrylic acid vapors 6 hours per day, 5 days per week, for 13 weeks. These exposure levels were selected after conducting a 2-week probe study in which 225 ppm caused pronounced growth retardation and nasal lesions in both rats and mice. The 13-week exposures had no adverse effect on the growth of male and female rats and male mice. However, mean body weight gains of female mice in the 25 and 75 ppm exposure groups were statistically significantly lower than for controls after 12 weeks of exposure. There were no pronounced treatment related effects on organ weights, hematologic parameters, clinical chemistry parameters or urinary parameters. Histopathologic examinations revealed lesions of the nasal mucosa in rats in the 75 ppm exposure group, and in some or all mice at each treatment level. The nasal lesions were primarily localized to the olfactory epithelium; the respiratory epithelium was relatively unaffected. The histopathologic observations in both rats and mice included degeneration, and inflammatory cell infiltration in the olfactory mucosa. In mice there were also instances of hyperplasia of the submucosal glands and, replacement of olfactory epithelium by respiratory epithelium. These effects were attributed to the irritant properties of acrylic acid vapors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.