Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LEWTAS, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LEWTAS, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 Oxford University Press

research-article

Genotoxicity of Complex Mixtures: Strategies for the Identification and Comparative Assessment of Airborne Mutagens and Carcinogens from Combustion Sources1,2

JOELLEN LEWTAS

Genetic Bioassay Branch, Genetic Toxicology Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

Received November 6, 1987; accepted November 18, 1987

Genotoxicity of Complex Mixtures: Strategies for the Identification and Comparative Assessment of Airborne Mutagens and Carcinogens from Combustion Sources. LEWTAS, J. (1988). Fundam. Appl Toxicol. 10, 571–589. Two strategies for assessment of the toxicity of complex mixtures are described and illustrated with examples from genotoxicity studies of complex combustion mixtures. The first, a strategy for identifying biologically active compounds or compound classes in complex mixtures, is called bioassay-directed fractionation and characterization. The identification and assessment of mutagens and potential carcinogens in complex mixtures has been significantly advanced by the use of short-term genetic bioassays. Bioassay-directed fractionation coupled with new analytical characterization methods has provided the tools needed to more efficiently identify potential carcinogens in complex combustion emissions and urban air samples. These studies have shown that a significant portion of the mutagenicity in combustion emissions and urban air is found in fractions more polar than polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). A second strategy, the comparative potency method, provides an approach to evaluating the relative toxicities of a series of mixtures. The comparative mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of a series of combustion emissions has been assessed using dose-response studies in bacteria, mammalian cells, and rodents. Comparative mutagenic and tumorigenic emission rates or emission factors provide a means to directly compare the relative hazard of the sources. This data base has also been used to develop a comparative risk assessment methodology for combustion emissions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.