Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2007
Toxicological Sciences 2008 102(1):187-195; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm294
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
102/1/187    most recent
kfm294v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkes, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kodell, R. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkes, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kodell, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Published by Oxford University Press 2007.

Modeling and Assaying Dioxin-Like Biological Effects for both Dioxin-Like and Certain Non-Dioxin–Like Compounds

Jon G. Wilkes*,1, Bruce S. Hass{dagger}, Dan A. Buzatu*, Lisa M. Pence{ddagger}, Jeffrey C. Archer{ddagger}, Richard D. Beger*, Laura K. Schnackenberg*, Mary Kim Halbert{ddagger}, Lisa Jennings{ddagger} and Ralph L. Kodell§

* Division of Systems Toxicology {dagger} Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology {ddagger} Dioxin Group, Arkansas Regional Laboratory § Department of Biostatistics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Building 26, HFT-233, National Center for Toxicological Research, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079. Fax: (870) 543-7686. E-mail: jon.wilkes{at}fda.hhs.gov.

Received August 16, 2007; accepted December 5, 2007


   Abstract

13C NMR data have been correlated to Toxic Equivalency Factors (TEFs) of the 29 PCDDs, PCDFs, or PCBs for which non-zero TEFs have been defined. Such correlations are called quantitative spectrometric data-activity relationship (QSDAR) models. An improved QSDAR model predicted TEFs of 0.037 and 0.004, respectively, for 1,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 1,2,3,4,7-pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD), both among the 390 congeners for which zero value TEFs are assumed. A QSDAR model of Relative Potency (REP) values estimated the corresponding values as 0.115 and 0.020. Results from both models indicated that these two congeners may exhibit significant dioxin-like toxicity. If other such congeners have non-zero toxicity, TEF-based risk assessments of some dioxin-, furan-, or PCB-contaminated sites or foods may underestimate toxicity. Both models were extensively cross-validated and the TEF model was externally validated. We confirmed the predictions by an independent in vitro method, a luciferase gene expression assay based on mouse liver cells that found REPs of 0.027 and 0.013, respectively, for 1,3,7,8-TCDD and 1,2,3,4,7-PeCDD. The QSDAR-estimated and gene-expression assayed values agreed. The models were used to predict activity for an applicability domain including 108 non-2,3,7,8 dioxin, furan, or PCB congeners and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorophenothiazine, a dioxin analog proposed as a drug candidate. This study showed that QSDAR prediction followed by a relatively inexpensive in vitro assay could be used to nominate a few candidates among hundreds for further investigation. It suggested that in silico and in vitro nomination protocols may facilitate practical risk assessment when chemical family members exhibit different degrees of toxicity operating via a common mechanism.

Key Words: regulatory/policy; dioxin; polychlorinated biphenyls; QSAR; biological modeling.


Disclaimer: Views presented here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.