Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2008
Toxicological Sciences 2008 104(1):155-162; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfn072
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/155    most recent
kfn072v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lison, D.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lison, D.
Right arrow Articles by Martens, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Nominal and Effective Dosimetry of Silica Nanoparticles in Cytotoxicity Assays

Dominique Lison*,1, Leen C. J. Thomassen{dagger}, Virginie Rabolli*, Laetitia Gonzalez{ddagger}, Dorota Napierska§, Jin Won Seo, Micheline Kirsch-Volders{ddagger}, Peter Hoet§, Christine E. A. Kirschhock{dagger} and Johan A. Martens{dagger}

* Industrial Toxicology and Occupational Medicine unit, Université catholique de Louvain, Avenue E. Mounier, 53.02, 1200 Brussels, Belgium {dagger} Center for Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 23, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium {ddagger} Laboratory of Cell Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan, 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium § Laboratory of Lung Toxicology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Department Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 44, bus 2450, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: +32-2-764-53-38. E-mail: dominique.lison{at}uclouvain.be.

Received December 6, 2007; accepted March 29, 2008


   Abstract

Because of their small size and large specific surface area (SA), insoluble nanoparticles are almost not affected by the gravitational force and are generally formulated in stable suspensions or sols. This raises, however, a potential difficulty in in vitro assay systems in which cells adhering to the bottom of a culture vessel may not be exposed to the majority of nanoparticles in suspension. J. G. Teeguarden et al., 2007, Toxicol. Sci. 95, 300–312 have recently addressed this issue theoretically, emphasizing the need to characterize the effective dose (mass or number or SA dose of particles that affect the cells) which, according to their model based on sedimentation and gravitation forces, might only represent a very small fraction of the nominal dose. We hypothesized, in contrast, that because of convection forces that usually develop in sols, the majority of the particles may reach the target cells and exert their potential toxicity. To address this issue, we exposed three different cell lines (A549 epithelial cells, EAHY926 endothelial cells, and J774 monocyte-macrophages) to a monodisperse suspension of Stöber silica nanoparticles (SNP) in three different laboratories. Four different end points (lacticodehydrogenase [LDH] release, LDH cell content, tetrazolium salt (MTT), and crystal violet staining) were used to assess the cell response to nanoparticles. We found, in all cell lines and for all end points, that the cellular response was determined by the total mass/number/SA of particles as well as their concentration. Practically, for a given volume of dispersion, both parameters are of course intimately interdependent. We conclude that the nominal dose remains the most appropriate metric for in vitro toxicity testing of insoluble SNP dispersed in aqueous medium. This observation has important bearings on the experimental design and the interpretation of in vitro toxicological studies with nanoparticles.

Key Words: nanotoxicology; cytotoxicity; nanoparticles; monodisperse silica.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
K. M. Waters, L. M. Masiello, R. C. Zangar, B. J. Tarasevich, N. J. Karin, R. D. Quesenberry, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. G. Teeguarden, J. G. Pounds, and B. D. Thrall
Macrophage Responses to Silica Nanoparticles are Highly Conserved Across Particle Sizes
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2009; 107(2): 553 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.