Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORRISSEY, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by MORRIS, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MORRISSEY, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by MORRIS, R. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1988 Oxford University Press

research-article

Evaluation of Rodent Sperm, Vaginal Cytology, and Reproductive Organ Weight Data from National Toxicology Program 13-Week Studies

RICHARD E. MORRISSEY, BERNARD A. SCHWETZ, JAMES C. LAMB, IV1, MONICA D. ROSS, JANET L. TEAGUE* and RICHARD W. MORRIS*

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program Systemic Toxicology Branch Research Triangle Park North Carolina 27709 *Analytical Sciences, Inc P.O. Box 13738 Research Triangle Prak, North Carolina 27709

Received September 11, 1987; accepted March 24, 1988

Evaluation of Rodent Sperm, Vaginal Cytology, and Reproductive Organ Weight Data from National Toxicology Program 13-Week Studies. Morrissey, R. E., Schwetz, B. A., Lamb, J. C, IV, Ross, M. D., Teague, J. L., and Morris, R. W. (1988). Fundam. Appl Toxicol. 11, 343-358. Sperm morphology and vaginal cytology examinations (SMVCEs), which include evaluations of motility, concentration and head morphology of sperm from the cauda epididymis, and male reproductive organ weight data, were developed by the National Toxicology Program as a screening system for reproductive toxicants. An analysis was conducted of SMVCE studies carried out at the end of fifty 13-week studies (25 for rats, 25 for mice) over a 3-year period. Statistically significant changes in these studies were summarized, as were control data for each male endpoint (mean, SD, 95% confidence limits around the mean, median, and statistical power). Reproductive organ weights (testis, epididymis, cauda epididymis) and sperm motility were the most statistically powerful endpoints evaluated; sperm head morphology may also be a sensitive endpoint for detecting reproductive toxicants. For 24 chemicals tested in both rats and mice, the concordance of results [i.e., no adverse effect in either species, or at least one SMVCE endpoint (not necessarily the same one) adversely affected in both species] was 58%. These data suggest that detection of potential reproductive toxicants might be best when both species are used. Types of sperm head abnormalities and their relative proportion of the total did not differ among control and treatment groups. Estrous cycle data were obtained in the final week of forty-six 13-week studies (23 for mice, 23 for rats). Only 3 chemicals caused an increase in mean cycle length compared with the control group. More data from breeding studies in which female estrous cycle length is measured are needed to assess fully the association of cycle length with reproductive outcome; stages of the estrous cycle are so variable that they may not be useful in assessing potential toxicity. Interiaboratory variability in SMVCE values for many endpoints was documented. Very few of the chemicals that form the basis of this report have been evaluated in definitive reproductive toxicology protocols; a companion paper compares changes in SMVCE endpoints with the outcome of continuous breeding reproduction studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.