Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on August 12, 2009
Toxicological Sciences 2009 112(1):221-228; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp180
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/1/221    most recent
kfp180v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgoon, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zacharewski, T. R.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgoon, L. D.
Right arrow Articles by Zacharewski, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Automated Dose-Response Analysis of the Relative Hepatic Gene Expression Potency of TCDF in C57BL/6 Mice

Lyle D. Burgoon*,{dagger},{ddagger},§, Qi Ding*,{dagger}, Alhaji N'jai*,{dagger}, Ed Dere*,{dagger}, Ashley R. Burg*,{dagger}, J. Craig Rowlands||, Robert A. Budinsky||, Kenneth E. Stebbins|| and Tim R. Zacharewski*,{dagger},{ddagger},§,1

* Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology {dagger} National Food Safety & Toxicology Center {ddagger} Center for Integrative Toxicology § Gene Expression in Development and Disease Initiative Quantitative Biology Initiative, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 || The Dow Chemical Company, Midland, Michigan 48674

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, 501 Biochemistry Building, Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48824-1319. Fax: 517-353-9334. E-mail: tzachare{at}msu.edu.

Received May 6, 2009; accepted July 28, 2009


   Abstract

Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) are assigned to dioxin-like chemicals based on relative potency (REP) values of individual adaptive and toxic responses compared to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Agilent 4x44K oligonucleotide microarrays were used to examine the hepatic gene expression potency of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF), relative to TCDD with complementary histopathology, TCDD and TCDF tissue level analysis, and ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) assay data. Immature ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice were gavaged with 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, or 100 µg/kg TCDD, the World Health Organization TEF-adjusted doses (10 x TCDD dose) of TCDF (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, or 300 µg/kg), or sesame oil vehicle and killed at 72 h. Two thousand two hundred eighty-eight and 1347 genes were differentially expressed (P1(t) > 0.90) at one or more doses by TCDD and TCDF, respectively. Automated dose-response modeling (ToxResponse Modeler) identified a total of 1027 and 837 genes with either a sigmoidal, exponential, linear, Gaussian, or quadratic dose-response relationship 72 h after treatment in TCDD and TCDF, respectively. Two hundred seventy genes exhibited a sigmoidal TCDD-induced dose-response (ED50s from 0.08 to 42.2 µg/kg) compared to only 179 sigmoidal responsive genes (ED50s from 0.74 to 299.9 µg/kg) elicited by TCDF. Of the 1027 TCDD dose-responsive genes, 654 were not examined further due to the lack of a dose response elicited by TCDF. Of the 373 genes that exhibited a TCDD and TCDF dose response, REPs were calculated for the 83 genes that exhibited comparable sigmoidal curve shapes and slopes. The median REP for these 83 genes was 0.10, with a maximum REP of 0.56 and a minimum of 0.01. REPs of 0.04 were also calculated for EROD and increase in relative liver weight (RLW) at 72 h. Collectively, the lower number of TCDF-induced genes compared to TCDD and the 0.04 REPs for EROD activity and increased RLW are not consistent with the TEF of 0.10 for the hepatotoxicity of TCDF in C57BL/6 mice at 72 h.

Key Words: TCDD; TCDF; TEF; microarray; liver; mouse; temporal; dose response.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.