Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on September 23, 2009
Toxicological Sciences 2009 112(2):311-321; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp233
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
112/2/311    most recent
kfp233v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfinger, R. D.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by Wolfinger, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Use of Short-term Transcriptional Profiles to Assess the Long-term Cancer-Related Safety of Environmental and Industrial Chemicals

Russell S. Thomas*,1, Wenjun Bao{dagger}, Tzu-Ming Chu{dagger}, Marina Bessarabova{ddagger}, Tatiana Nikolskaya{ddagger},§, Yuri Nikolsky§, Melvin E. Andersen* and Russell D. Wolfinger{dagger}

* The Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 {dagger} SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina 27513 {ddagger} Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Moscow B333, 117809, Russia § GeneGo, Inc., St Joseph, Michigan 49085

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: (919)-558-1300. E-mail: rthomas{at}thehamner.org.

Received July 13, 2009; accepted August 25, 2009


   Abstract

The process for evaluating chemical safety is inefficient, costly, and animal intensive. There is growing consensus that the current process of safety testing needs to be significantly altered to improve efficiency and reduce the number of untested chemicals. In this study, the use of short-term gene expression profiles was evaluated for predicting the increased incidence of mouse lung tumors. Animals were exposed to a total of 26 diverse chemicals with matched vehicle controls over a period of 3 years. Upon completion, significant batch-related effects were observed. Adjustment for batch effects significantly improved the ability to predict increased lung tumor incidence. For the best statistical model, the estimated predictive accuracy under honest fivefold cross-validation was 79.3% with a sensitivity and specificity of 71.4 and 86.3%, respectively. A learning curve analysis demonstrated that gains in model performance reached a plateau at 25 chemicals, indicating that the size of current data set was sufficient to provide a robust classifier. The classification results showed that a small subset of chemicals contributed disproportionately to the misclassification rate. For these chemicals, the misclassification was more closely associated with genotoxicity status than with efficacy in the original bioassay. Statistical models were also used to predict dose-response increases in tumor incidence for methylene chloride and naphthalene. The average posterior probabilities for the top models matched the results from the bioassay for methylene chloride. For naphthalene, the average posterior probabilities for the top models overpredicted the tumor response, but the variability in predictions was significantly higher. The study provides both a set of gene expression biomarkers for predicting chemically induced mouse lung tumors and a broad assessment of important experimental and analysis criteria for developing microarray-based predictors of safety-related end points.

Key Words: genomics; biomarkers; rodent cancer bioassays.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.