Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THRALL, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by BULL, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by THRALL, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by BULL, R. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

research-article

Differences in the Distribution of Iodine and Iodide in the Sprague–Dawley Rat

KARLA D. THRALL and R. J. BULL

Pharmacology/Toxicologv Graduate Program, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University Pullman, Washington 99164-6510

Received August 10, 1989; accepted December 19, 1989

Differences in the Distribution of Iodine and Iodide in the Sprague-Dawley Rat. THRALL, K. D., AND BULL, R. J. (1990). Fundam Appl. Toxicol. 15, 75–81. Use of iodine as a drinking water disinfectant for extended space flight raises concerns about potential chronic effects on health. A key question is whether the chemical form of iodine might play a role. To address this question the influence chemical form has on the uptake and distribution of radioiodine was studied in fed and fasted rats. Following oral administration of 125I2 or 125I, blood 125I levels were maximal at 2 hr and reached similar concentrations in fed animals receiving 125I and fasted animals receiving either 125I2 or 125I However, when 125I2 was administered to fed animals the initial levels of 125I into blood were significantly lower than after the other treatments. The half-life of elimination of 125I from the blood appeared independent of the form of iodine administered. The initial distribution of 125I to the thyroid depended sharply on chemical form, being greater when iodide rather than iodine was administered, whether animals were fed or fasted. In fed animals administered I2, this may largely be explained by the increased retention of 125I in the stomach contents. In fasted animals, both stomach content and blood levels of I were similar whether I2 or I was administered. Since thyroid uptake of iodine is specific for I, this suggests that the form of iodine in the blood was different in animals administered I2. This notion was further supported by the finding that pretreatment of animals with varying concentrations of I in drinking water was four times as effective in suppressing the uptake of a test dose of 125I than pretreatment with equivalent concentrations of I2.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.