Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GAD, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GAD, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

other

Recent Developments in Replacing, Reducing, and Refining Animal Use in Toxicologic Research and Testing1

SHAYNE COX GAD

G. D. Searle & Company 4901 Searle Parkway, Skokie, illinois 60077

Received January 22, 1990; accepted January 30, 1990

Recent Developments in Replacing, Reducing, and Refining Animal Use in Toxicologic Research and Testing. GAD, S. C. (1990). Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 15, 8–16. Significant progress has been made in replacing animals in toxicology/safety assessment with in vitro systems, in reducing the number of animals used, and in refining how they are used. Review of annual reports of the numbers of animals used in testing in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan shows a continuing reduction in the numbers for all species. Multiple in vitro systems have been developed for screening/testing for eye and skin irritation, skin sensitization, teratology, and other endpoints and a scientific consensus has been formed on requirements and process for validation. However, the use of these test systems in place of existing in vivo tests is minimal. At the same time, innovative designs have been developed (and are in wide use) for in vivo tests which reduce both the numbers and the pain and distress of animals used in testing. Progress and dialogue continue on modification of both U.S. and international requirements and guidelines for testing, and for defining an "approval" process for alternatives and innovations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.