Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MERSHON, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by WADE, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by MERSHON, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by WADE, J. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Oxford University Press

research-article

Hairless Guinea Pig Bioassay Model for Vesicant Vapor Exposures1

MILLARD M. MERSHON2, LARRY W. MITCHELTREE, JOHN P. PETRALI, ERNEST H. BRAUE and JOHN V. WADE

U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland 21010-5425

Received February 15, 1990; accepted June 22, 1990

Hairless Guinea Pig Bioassay Model for Vesicant Vapor Exposures. Mershon, M. M., Mitcheltree, L. W., Petrali, J. P., BraUE, E. H., and Wade, J. V. (1990). Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 15, 622–630. Sulfur mustard (HD; 1,1'-thiobis[2-chloroethane]) induces fluid-filled blisters in man but not in conventional laboratory animals. An animal model is needed to emulate both cytotoxic (vesicant) and vascular (irritant) responses of human skin to HD exposures. An acceptable model must permit reproducible comparisons of uniformly graded and doserelated HD control responses with reduced responses that may follow antivesicant treatments. Hairless guinea pigs were evaluated by exposing six or eight dorsal skin sites 12 mm in diameter to similar HD vapor concentrations for graded intervals (1–16 min). HD vapor was delivered under occlusive caps holding 10 µl of HD in filter paper located 5 mm above the skin. Four-minute exposures induced moderate erythema, slight edema, and microblisters in 1 of 39 sites. Eight-minute exposures induced severe erythema, moderate edema, and microblisters in 31 of 40 sites. Gross blistering was not seen after use of vapor cups, but damage to basal cells resembled lesions of vesicant injury in man. The hairless guinea pig model, with graded HD vapor exposures, provides acceptable comparisons of responses. Exposures of both 4- and 8-min durations were used to show the feasibility of using this model to bioassay antivesicant topical protectants. These methods may be useful for measurements of irritant and cytotoxic responses of skin to other toxic vapors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.