Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RIDOUT, G.
Right arrow Articles by GUY, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by RIDOUT, G.
Right arrow Articles by GUY, R. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Effects of Zwitterionic Surfactants on Skin Barrier Function

GEOFFREY RIDOUT*,1, ROBERT S. HINZ*, JURU J. HOSTYNEK{dagger}, A. KRISHNA REDDY{dagger}, RICHARD J. WIERSEMA{dagger}, CONNIE D. HODSON*, CYNTHIA R. LORENCE* and RICHARD H. GUY*,2

*Departments of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, California 94143 {dagger}Clorox Technical Center 7200 Johnson Drive, Pleasanton, California 94566

Received December 28, 1989; accepted August 31, 1990

The action of five zwitterionic surfactants on the barrier function of hairless mouse skin has been studied in vitro. The surfactants considered were dodecylbetaine and hexadecylbetaine (C12BET and C16BET, respectively), hexadecylsul-fobetaine (C16SUB), JV.A'-dimethyl-A'-dodecylamine oxide (C12AO), and dodecyltrimethylam-monium bromide (C12TAB). Excised skin was pretreated with each surfactant, at various concentrations, for 16 hr, following which the permeation of a model compound, nicotinamide, was measured. The action of the surfactants was assessed by comparing nicotinamide flux through surfactant-pretreated skin with that across control membranes which were exposed to buffer alone for 16 hr. All surfactants decreased skin barrier function to some extent The degree of nicotinamide penetration enhancement induced was correlated with the ratio of the surfactant pretreatment concentration to the surfactant critical micelle concentration, suggesting that solubilization of stratum corneum lipids may be an important mechanism in explaining the effects observed. More detailed studies with l4C-radiolabeled C12BET and C16BET showed that the dodecyl analog was itself well absorbed, whereas the C16 compound partitioned into the skin favorably but then transferred only very slowly into the receptor phase. These observations were consistent with toxicity studies (albeit at much higher concentrations in a different animal model, the rat) which indicated that the dermal LD50 of C12BET was significantly less than that of C16BET (the value for which was so large that it could not be reliably determined). Overall, this study provides, we believe, useful information pertinent to the potential dermal toxicity of the surfactants considered following occupational or environmental exposure, c 1991 Soday of Toxicology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.