Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REEL, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by LAMB, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by REEL, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by LAMB, J. C., IV
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Reproductive Toxicity Evaluation of Acetaminophen in Swiss CD-1 Mice Using a Continuous Breeding Protocol

JERRY R. REEL*,1, A. DAVIS LAWTON* and JAMES C. LAMB, IV{dagger},2

*Chemistry and Life Sciences Group, Research Triangle Institute P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park North Carolina 27709 {dagger}Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Group, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Received February 12, 1991; accepted August 22, 1991

Acetaminophen (APAP) was evaluated for reproductive toxicity in Swiss CD-1 mice using a continuous breeding protocol. APAP was administered in the diet at 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0% (w/w), which represented average daily intakes of 0, 357, 715, and 1430 mg APAP/kg/day, respectively. Exposure of parental (P) breeding pairs to 1% APAP in the diet for 14 weeks during cohabitation significantly decreased the number of litters per pair, and reduced, although not significantly, the number of live pups per litter. Importantly, 6 of 19 high-dose P pairs failed to produce a fifth litter, and this fully accounted for the diminished number of litters in this group. In addition, the fifth litter that was produced by the 13 high-dose P pairs averaged only about 9 live pups per litter, which correspondingly reduced the overall group average for this parameter. In comparison, the control and two lower-dose P pairs produced 11 or 12 live pups per litter on average. Although the birth weights for F1 pups in the final litter were unaffected by prenatal APAP exposure, postnatal growth was adversely affected as evidenced by retarded weight gain as measured at 28 and 74 ± 10 days of age for all three dietary levels. At 1% APAP this weight gain effect was more pronounced at Day 28 than at Day 74 ± 10, suggesting that nursing pups may have been exposed to higher concentrations or may be more sensitive to APAP and/or an active metabolite than were the young adults. A mating trial of F1 pairs at 74 ± 10 days of age indicated that mating, fertility, and reproductive performance were normal, except that the birth weight of F2 pups was significantly depressed at 1% APAP. This latter effect may have been attributable to maternal toxicity in that body weight and relative pituitary weight were significantly decreased, and relative brain and liver weight significantly increased, in high-dose F1 females. In addition, body weight was significantly reduced in the high-dose F1 males at necropsy. No treatmentrelated effects on reproductive organ weights and no gross or histological changes in the reproductive tissues of the high-dose F1 male and female mice were observed. Continuous exposure of F1 males at 1% APAP, however, significantly increased the percentage of abnormal epididymal sperm, while sperm density and percentage of motile sperm were unaffected. Collectively, these data indicated that continuous exposure to 1% APAP via the diet (1.43 g/kg/day) led to cumulative effects on reproduction in the P pairs, to retarded growth and abnormal sperm in the F1 mice, and to reduced birth weight of F2 pups.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.