Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DANIEL, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by PAGE, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DANIEL, F. B.
Right arrow Articles by PAGE, N. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Hepatocarcinogenicity of Chioral Hydrate, 2-Chloroacetaldehyde, and Dichioroacetic Acid in the Male B6C3F1 Mouse1

F. BERNARD DANIEL*, ANTHONY B. DEANGELO{dagger}, JUDY A. STOBER*, GREG R. OLSON{ddagger} and NORBERT P. PAGE§

*Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 {dagger}Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 {ddagger}Pathology Associates, Inc., 6217 Center Park Drive West Chester, Ohio 45069 §Page Associates, 17601 Stoneridge Court Gaithersburg, Maryland 20878

Received September 3, 1991; accepted January 15, 1992

The chlorinated acetaldehydes, chloral hydrate (CH) and 2-chloroacetaldehyde (CAA), have been identified as chlorination by-products in finished drinking water supplies. Although both chemicals are genotoxic, their potential for carcinogenicity had not been adequately explored. The studies reported here are chronic bioassays conducted with male B6C3F1 mice exposed to levels of 1 g/liter CH and 0.1 g/liter CAA via the drinking water for 104 weeks. Distilled water (H2O) served as the untreated control and dichloroacetic acid (DCA; 0.5 g/liter), another chlorine disinfection by-product, was included. The mean daily ingested doses were approximately 166 mg/kg/day for CH, 17 mg/kg/day for CAA, and 93 mg/kg/day for DCA. Evaluations included mortality, body weight, organ weights, gross pathology, and histopathology. The primary target organ was the liver as the organ weights and pathological changes in the other organs (spleen, kidneys, and testes) were comparable between the treated groups and the H2O control group. Liver weights were increased for all three test chemicals at the terminal euthanasia with the greatest increase seen in the CH and DCA groups. Hepatocellular necrosis was induced by all three test chemicals, and it was also most prevalent and severe in the CH and DCA groups. A significant increase in the prevalence of liver tumors was seen for all three chemicals. The strongest response was with DCA, in which 63% of the 104-week survivors had hepatocellular carcinomas (carcinomas) and 42% possessed hepatocellular adenomas (adenomas) and the combined prevalence for carcinomas plus adenoma was 75%. The corresponding prevalence rate for carcinomas, adenomas, and combined tumors were 46, 29, and 71% 31, 8, and 38% and 10, 5, and 15% for CH, CAA, and H2O, respectively. In addition to the tumors we evaluated the prevalence of a possible preneoplastic lesion, the hepatocellular hyperplastic nodule (nodules), a lesion which occurred in all three treated groups but not in the H2O group.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.