Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAWSON, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by WILKE, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DAWSON, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by WILKE, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Joint Actions of Developmental Toxicants in Xenopus Embryos: Binary Mixtures of DNA Synthesis Inhibitors1,2

DOUGLAS A. DAWSON and TERESA S. WILKE

Department of Animal Science, College of Veterinary Medicine, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37901-1071

Received July 15, 1991; accepted February 13, 1992

The joint toxic action for each of three binary combinations of DNA synthesis inhibitors was examined at concentrations that induce malformations in Xenopus laevis embryos. The three compounds, hydroxyurea, cytosine arabinoside, and 5-fluoro- uracil, which each inhibit a different enzyme involved in DNA synthesis, were selected for joint action testing to help determine whether joint action types are related to general modes of action (e.g., inhibit DNA synthesis) or to specific biochemical/molecular mechanisms. Three mixtures were tested, in 96-hr static-renewal tests, for each combination. Each combination was tested on three separate occasions. Using toxic unit analysis, the joint action for induction of malformations was generally antagonism, although response addition was observed for certain mixtures. An antagonistic joint action represents the phenomenon of interaction. Therefore, the tests were ineffective in determining whether a concentration addition joint action depicts two compounds that induce malformations by the same general mode of action or by the same specific mechanism of action.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.