Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENDERSON, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by HAHN, F. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HENDERSON, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by HAHN, F. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Effect of Exposure Pattern on the Accumulation of Particles and the Response of the Lung to Inhaled Particles1

R. F. HENDERSON, E. B. BARR, Y. S. CHENG, W. C. GRIFFITH and F. F. HAHN

Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute P.O. Box 5890, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

Received January 16, 1992; accepted April 28, 1992

We hypothesized that a rapid rate of delivery of particles to the lung would overwhelm the normal clearance mechanisms of the lung and result in a higher lung burden of particles and a greater inflammatory response than a slower rate of particle de livery. F344/N rats were exposed over a 12-week period to the same weekly concentration times time product of carbon black (CB) particles, but at three different exposure rates: 3.5 mg/m3 16 hr/day, 7 days/week; 13 mg/m3 6 hr/day, 5 days/week or 98 mg/rn 4 hr/day, 1 day/week. The intermediate exposure rate was chosen to mimic an occupational work week and to give an 8-br, time-weighted average exposure equal to the threshold limit value (TLV) for nuisance dusts of the American College of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (10 mg/rn Pure CB has a lower TLV, 3.5 mg/m3 than nuisance dusts, but this is based on avoidance of excessive dirtiness in the workplace, not on the toxicity of CS. Lung burdens of CB were measured after 3, 6, 9, and 12 weeks of exposure and at 4,8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks after the exposure ended. The inflammatory response was quantified by analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) after 6 and 12 weeks of exposure and at 1, 12, and 24 weeks after exposure. The histopathology of the lung was evaluated at the end of the exposure and at 24 weeks after the exposure. Acquired lung burdens were between 3 and 4 mg/lung at the end of the exposure. There was an approximately 20% higher lung burden in the rats exposed at the lowest rate of delivery, but this did not result in any differences among the three groups in the inflammatory response or the lesions in the lung. By 6 weeks, there was a mild inflammatory response to the particles and this response was increased by 12 weeks of exposure as indicated by an influx of neutrophils, two- to threefold increases in protein and in lactate dehydrogenase activity, and up to sixfold increases in ß-glueuronidase activity in the BALF. Morphologic changes were minimal, consisting of slight thickening of the alveolar septa with hypertrophied epithelial cells, scant collagen fibers, and occasional inflammatory cells adjacent to accumulations of particles. The data support the use of time-weighted averages in regulating exposures to nuisance dusts. The results of the study indicate that exposures to a particle of relatively low toxicity at the current TLV for nuisance dusts led to pulmonary inflammation and sufficient accumulation of particles to slow lung clearance. The results suggest that the TLV for nuisance dusts may be too high.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.