Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GERBERICK, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by RYAN, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GERBERICK, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by RYAN, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

Examination of the Local Lymph Node Assay for Use in Contact Sensitization Risk Assessment

G. FRANK GERBERICK*, ROBERT V. HOUSE{dagger}, E. ROBERT FLETCHER* and CINDY A. RYAN*

*The Procter and Gamble Company, Mlami Valley Laboratories Cincinnati, Ohio {dagger}IIT Research institute Chicago, Illinois

Received November 21, 1991; accepted April 29, 1992

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) for contact sensitization risk assessment. Cellular proliferative activity in draining lymph nodes was determined for individual animals on Day 5 following four daily epicutaneous applications of the test chemical to the ears. Seventeen chemicals were tested, covering a range of materials including preservatives, drug actives, and perfume raw materials. The assay was found to be useful for identifying strong, moderate, and some weak sensitizers as defined by other testing methods (guinea pig, human). For evaluating the antigen spec ificity of the LLNA proliferative response, an in vitro blastogenesis assay was used. Dendritic cells (DC) isolated from lymph nodes of mice treated 24 hr earlier with trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) were capable of in vitro stimulation of lymphocytes from TNCB-sensitized mice, but not lymphocytes from mice sensitized to the preservative mixture of 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazolinone plus 2-methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI). Conversely, DC from mice treated 24 hr earlier with MCI/MI were capable of stimulating lymphocytes from MCI/MI-sensitized mice, but were unable to stimulate lymphocytes from TNCB-sensitized mice, demonstrating the specificity of the response. The results of these studies support the use of the marine LLNA for both investigative and predictive contact sensitization testing. The LLNA offers the advantages of requiring less time for completion, incorporating an objective endpoint, requiring approximately half the number of animals, and being less costly than most currently employed guinea pig test methods. In addition, we believe the murine LLNA is a useful test to incorporate into a scheme for contact sensitization risk assessment. The major advantage of this approach is that the LLNA will provide information which will allow one to proceed directly to confirmatory human predictive testing without performing guinea pig testing.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.