Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BARBER, E.
Right arrow Articles by GUEST, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BARBER, E.
Right arrow Articles by GUEST, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 Oxford University Press

research-article

A Comparative Study of the Rates of in Vitro Percutaneous Absorption of Eight Chemicals Using Rat and Human Skin1

EUGENE BARBER, NANCY M. TEETSEL, KATHLEEN F. KOLBERG and DEREK GUEST

Biochemical Toxicology Section, Toxicological Sciences Laboratory, Health and Environment Laboratories, Eastman Kodak Company Rochester, New York 14652-3615

Received December 6, 1991; accepted May 18, 1992

In vitro percutaneous absorption studies were carried out for eight chemicals using full thickness rat skin and human stratum corneum. The purpose of the studies was to compare the rates of absorption for the two species. For each of the chemicals, the observed rate using full thickness rat skin was greater than that observed for human stratum corneum. The ratios of the rates (rat/human) varied from 1.7 to 5.8 with a mean value of 3.1. The chemicals tested were tritiated water, 2-ethoxyethylacetate, diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, urea, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, 2-ethylhexanol, ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate, and 2-propoxyethanol. The chemicals were chosen to represent a wide range of physical properties and permeability constant values. It was concluded that rat skin was more permeable than human skin for each of these eight chemicals. This conclusion is supported by similar findings from studies in other laboratories and suggests that results from studies in the rat overestimate skin absorption in man.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.