Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURGER, J.
Right arrow Articles by GOCHFELD, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BURGER, J.
Right arrow Articles by GOCHFELD, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1993 Oxford University Press

research-article

Lead and Behavioral Development in Young Herring Gulls: Effects of Timing of Exposure on Individual Recognition

JOANNA BURGER*,{dagger} and MICHAEL GOCHFELD{dagger},{ddagger}

*Biological Sciences, Rutgers University Piscataway, New Jersey 08855 {dagger}Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute Piscataway, New Jersey, 08855 {ddagger}Environmental and Community Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School Piscataway, New Jersey 08855

Received January 13, 1993; accepted May 13, 1993

Lead exposure early in life affects behavioral, physiological, and intellectual development in humans and other animals. Recognition of parents or other caregivers and eventual bonding are essential aspects of behavioral development. In this paper young herring gulls, Larus argentatus, were used to examine the effect of timing of lead exposure on individual recognition behavior and development. Each of 60 1-day-old herring gull chicks was randomly assigned to a control group or to one of three treatment groups that received a single dose of lead nitrate solution (100 mg/kg) at Day 2 or 6 of age or the same total dose divided in thirds on Day 2, 4, and 6. Matched controls were injected with isotonic saline on the same schedules. Variations in individual recognition of human attendants were largely explained by age and status (lead versus control), and some variation was explained by day of injection (exposure regime). Using a feeding paradigm, the percentage responding to their caretaker compared to another person was higher (70% versus 38%), and occurred earlier in controls compared to lead-injected birds. Lead-injected birds required longer to respond initially, took longer to choose, moved less distance per time, and took longer to eventually reach the food. These results were all significant by GLM models and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Among lead-injected birds there was a disjunction of effect related to dosing schedule: birds injected on Day 6 chose more correctly but were slower to respond, indicating that these behavioral traits were differently affected by timing of exposure. These data suggest that there is a critical period during development when individual recognition can be disrupted by lead.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.