Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by STOKER, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by COOPER, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by STOKER, T. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

other

Pregnancy Alterations Following Xenobiotic-Induced Delays in Ovulation in the Female Rat1

RALPH L. COOPER*, MICHELLE A. BARRETT{dagger}, JEROME M. GOLDMAN*, GEORGIA R. REHNBERG*, W. K. MCELROY* and TAMMY E. STOKER{dagger}

*Reproduction Toxicology Branch, Developmental Toxicology Division, Health Effects Research Laboratory U S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711 {dagger}Man Tech Environmental Technology Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27709

Received November 6, 1992; accepted October 29, 1993

Chlordimeform [N'-(4-chloro-o-tolyl)-N,N-dimethylformamidine] has been shown to cause a 1-day delay in the surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) in ovariectomized, steroid-primed female rats, presumably through its ability to block CNS {alpha}-noradrenergic receptors and consequently CNS regulation of anterior pituitary function. In the present study, we determined whether a chlordimeform-induced delay in the ovulatory surge of LH would alter pregnancy outcome in intact females. Chlordimeform (50 mg/kg) or sodium pentobarbital (35 mg/kg), as a positive control, was administered in order to delay ovulation 24 (1-day delay) or 48 hr (2-day delay). Females were then housed with proven fertile males on the evening of proestrus (0-day delay group), the following evening (1-day delay group), or the evening after that (2-day delay group). The number of receptive females in each group, the mean lordosis quotient, and the number of sperm-positive females in each group were recorded. All females were killed on Gestation Day 20. The number of pregnant females in the 1- or 2-day delay groups was reduced with both chlordimeform and pentobarbital. Also, delaying ovulation for 1 or 2 days with either compound resulted in a significant reduction in the number of live pups present on Gestation Day 20 and a decrease in the number of implantation sites. Litter size was not affected if the females were mated on the same day that treatment was administered (0-day delay). Pentobarbital did not alter the proportion of females showing sexual behavior or the mean lordosis quotient in the 0- and 1-day delay groups, although fewer 1-day females were sperm positive. The number of sexually active and sperm-positive females was reduced in the 2-day pentobarbital-delayed group. However, the lordosis quotient of those that were sexually active was not different than that of control. Similarly, in CDF-treated groups, the proportion of females showing sexual activity was reduced in the 0- and 2-day delayed groups. In contrast, sexual behavior was lower in the 0-day delayed females when tested 2 hr after lights out. These females did eventually mate, however, as confirmed by the high incidence of sperm positive smears the following morning. The number of sperm positive females was lower in both the 1- and 2-day chlordimeform-induced delay groups. Thus, brief exposures to compounds such as formamidine pesticide chlordimeform will result in not only a delay in breeding but, more importantly, a significant reduction in litter size.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.