Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RAWLINGS, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by WILKS, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by RAWLINGS, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by WILKS, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 Oxford University Press

research-article

Effect of Dosing Vehicle on the Dermal Absorption of Fluazifop-butyl and Fomesafen in Rats in Vivo

JOHN M. RAWLINGS1, JENNIFER HILTON, KATHRYN L. TREBILCOCK, BRUCE H. WOOLLEN and MARTIN F. WILKS

Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SKIO 4TJ, England

Received July 8, 1993; accepted November 11, 1993

One important factor which may influence the extent and rate of percutaneous absorption is the dosing vehicle. The purpose of the experiments described was to compare the effect of dosing vehicles of different polarities on the absorption of two herbicides across rat skin in vivo. Rats were dosed dermally with either fluazifop-butyl (logPoct 4.5) or fomesafen sodium salt (log-Poct -1.2) in propylene glycol (PG), octanol (OCT), or ethyl decanoate (ED), and the amount of radioactivity excreted in urine was determined. Absorption rates were estimated from the urinary excretion data and from blood kinetic data derived from intravenously dosed rats. For fluazifop-butyl the average rate of absorption (x10-2 ug/hr-1 ±SE) was not greatly influenced by the dosing vehicle (OCT, 2.94 ± 0.08; ED, 3.66 ± 0.10; PG, 3.95 ± 0.32) despite relatively large differences in solubility (PG, 38 mg/ml; OCT, and ED, >600 mg/ml). These results were consistent with the finding that there was at most only a twofold difference in the epidermal membrane:vehicle partition coefficients (km). In contrast, the absorption rate of fomesafen from PG (1.98 ± 0.04) was approximately half that of ED (3.98 ± 0.06) and OCT (4.49 ± 0.08) for the first 30 hr after application and was in keeping with solubility data (PG, 638 mg/ml; OCT, 12 mg/ml; ED, < 10 mg/ml). At later time points the absorption of fomesafen from PG increased; this is discussed in relation to the penetration-enhancing properties of PG. The dermal absorption potential for fomesafen is dependent on the solubility of the polar compound in the vehicle while for the more lipophillic fluazifop-butyl, measurement of vehicle/skin partition coefficients may be a more appropriate predictor of absorption.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.