Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PARKINSON, C.
Right arrow Articles by WALKER, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PARKINSON, C.
Right arrow Articles by WALKER, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

The Value of Information Generated by Long-Term Toxicity Studies in the Dog for the Nonclinical Safety Assessment of Pharmaceutical Compounds

CHRISTOPHER PARKINSON*,{dagger}, CYNTHIA E. LUMLEY* and STUART R. WALKER*

*Centre for Medicines Research Woodmanslerne Road, Carshalton, Surrey SM5 4DS, United Kingdom {dagger}Welsh School of Pharmacy, University of Wales College of Cardiff Cardiff CF1 1TA, United Kingdom

Received February 8, 1994; accepted August 10, 1994

Data on 117 pharmaceutical compounds in the CMR toxicology database have been analyzed to determine what new toxicological information was provided by the dog in chronic (6 months or longer) toxicity testing. For more than half of the 117 compounds, all salient effects in the dog were seen for the first time within 3 months. For just under one-third of the compounds, any effects that occurred for the first time beyond 3 months in the dog were also seen in studies in the rat. Only 13 of the 117 compounds showed new and possibly important effects in the chronic study. No particular therapeutic class nor any other single circumstance was implicated in these 13 cases. Types of late-onset findings in the dog occurring with more than 1 compound included nonspecific effects or hypertrophic/hyperplastic changes. There may be several reasons, pragmatic as well as scientific, why it can sometimes be desirable to carry out chronic repeat-dose studies of 6 months or longer in the dog. However, the results of this retrospective evaluation have demonstrated that in the large majority of cases analyzed, long-term toxicity studies in the dog provide relatively little qualitatively new toxicological information not already gained from a short-term (3 month) study in the dog in conjunction with short- and long-term studies in the rat.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.