Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PASTERNAK, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PASTERNAK, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, W. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 Oxford University Press

research-article

First-Order Toxicity Assays for Eye Irritation Using Cell Lines: Parameters That Affect in Vitro Evaluation1

ANDREW S. PASTERNAK and WILLIAM M. MILLER2

Department of Chemical Engineering, Northwestern University Illinois 60208-3120

Received March 4, 1994; accepted October 10, 1994

First-order toxicity assays can be used to rapidly screen test agents. Investigators in many laboratories have used cultured cell lines to obtain correlations between first-order assay end-points and in vivo eye irritation (Draize test) for a wide variety of compounds. Since validation is a key step in assay acceptance, it is important to understand which factors alter the responses of cell-line-based assays. In this study we examine: (1) the presence and configuration of a type I collagen gel; (2) the responses of epithelial (Sf-l-Ep) and fibroblast (Sire and 3T3) cell lines; (3) the total glutathione content, ATP content, methionine incorporation, and neutral red absorption endpoint assays; (4) alcohol (C2-C8), surfactant (Tween 20), and heavy metal (NiCl) test agents; and (5) test agent exposure time (1 to 24 hr). The presence of a collagen gel and the cell type did not significantly affect endpoint assay R50 (test agent concentration that decreases assay response by 50%) values for a 1-hr exposure to hexanol. The ATP and glutathione endpoints (after 1-hr exposure) are able to distinguish between the relative in vivo toxicities of C2-C8 normal alcohols. All four endpoint assays detected sublethal damage, with the ATP and methionine endpoints being the most sensitive. The type of test agent affects the endpoint response, as shown by the lack of a glutathione R50 value for a 1-hr exposure to Tween 20 or NiCl. Even for a single test agent, endpoint assay R50 values may decrease continuously (ATP), decrease and then stabilize (glutathione), or remain unchanged (methionine incorporation) during a 24-hr exposure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.