Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ELDRIDGE, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDSWORTHY, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by ELDRIDGE, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by GOLDSWORTHY, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

research-article

Cell Proliferation Rates in Common Cancer Target Tissues of B6C3F1 Mice and F344 Rats: Effects of Age, Gender, and Choice of Marker1

SANDRA R. ELDRIDGE2 and SUSAN M. GOLDSWORTHY

Pathology Associates International 4915 D Prospectus Drive, Durham, North Carolina 27713

Received March 15, 1995; accepted March 7, 1996

Increasing emphasis is being placed on mode of action for chemical carcinogens as an important consideration for risk assessment. Many rodent carcinogens appear to act through nongenotoxic mechanisms, such as induced cell proliferation. Information on cell proliferation rates based on species, age, gender, tissue, and choice of marker will provide a foundation for incorporating such measurements into rodent toxicity studies. Cell proliferation was evaluated in liver, kidney, skin, and forestomach of control male and female B6C3F1 mice and F344 rats at 7, 10, 13, and 20 weeks of age. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), an endogenous cell proliferation marker, and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) administered by ip injection 2 hr before euthanization were compared as markers of cell proliferation. Only in liver were BrdU and PCNA labeling indices (LIs; S phase only) statistically similar. As expected, the PCNA proliferating index (PI; G1 + S + G2 + M phases) was consistently greater than the S phase LI in all tissues examined. Age-related differences in LI were evident in liver and kidney, whereas LIs in the forestomach and skin were not agedependent. In all tissues examined, gender-and species-related differences in cell proliferation were detected. Although BrdU and PCNA LIs were often statistically different, they both provided a useful indication of cell proliferation rates in the tissues examined. These results provide potentially useful information for designing rodent toxicity studies and biological models of carcinogenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.