Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KIMBER, I.
Right arrow Articles by SELGRADE, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KIMBER, I.
Right arrow Articles by SELGRADE, M. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

other

Identification of Respiratory Allergens1,2

IAN KIMBER*, I. LEONARD BERNSTEIN{dagger}, MERYL H. KAROL{ddagger}, MICHAEL K. ROBINSON§, KATHERINE SARLO§ and MARYJANE K. SELGRADE

*Zeneca Central Toxicology Laboratory Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TJ, United Kingdom {dagger}Department of Internal Medicine,.Division of Immunology and Allergy, Universirv of Cincinnati Medical Center Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0563 {ddagger}Center for Environmental and Occupational Health and Toxicology, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health. University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 §Human and Environmental Safety Division, Miami Valley Laboratories, The Procter and Gamble Company Cincinnati, Ohio 45253-8707; Immunotoxicology Branch, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

Received May 9, 1996; accepted May 13, 1996

A variety of chemicals and proteins can sensitize the respiratory tract. Among these are materials of industrial importance, including certain diisocyanates, acid anhydrides, reactive dyes, and enzymes. Currently, no widely accepted or well-validated methods for the prospective identification of respiratory allergens exist. Most progress has been made with guinea pig methods where sensitizing potential is measured usually by assessment of changes in pulmonary function induced following sensitization and challenge. However, these methods are often prohibitively expensive, particularly for screening purposes. A number of alternative appreaches are under consideration and are described here. The nature of the health problems associated with occupational respiratory sensitization, chemical structure-activity analyses as a tool for detecting pulmonary allergens, approaches used to test for respiratory allergens in guinea pigs, and alternative approaches using mice are all discussed. Finally, regulatory issues and needs with respect to respiratory sensitization are outlined.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.