Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PRICE, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by SCHWETZ, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PRICE, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by SCHWETZ, B. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 Oxford University Press

other

The Developmental Toxicity of Boric Acid in Rabbits1

CATHERINE J. PRICE*,2, MELISSA C. MARR*, CHRISTINA MYERS*, JOHN C. SEELY{dagger}, JERROLD J. HEINDEL{ddagger} and BERNARD A. SCHWETZ{ddagger},3

*Chemistry and Life Science, Center for Life Sciences and Toxicology, Research Triangle Institute P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194 {dagger}PATHCO, Inc. P.O. Box 12796, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 {ddagger}Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology Group, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences P.O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Received October 20, 1995; accepted August 14, 1996

Boric acid (BA), an ingredient of many pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and pesticide products, was previously shown to induce reproductive and developmental toxicity in laboratory rodents. In this study, BA (0, 62.5, 125, or 250 mg/kg/day, po) was administered on Gestational Days (GD) 6–19 to New Zealand White rabbits (18–23 pregnant/group). Maternal body weight, food consumption, and clinical condition were monitored at regular intervals throughout gestation. At termination (GD 30), the numbers of uterine implantations, resorptions, dead fetuses, and live fetuses were determined. Fetuses were weighed, and live fetuses examined for external, visceral, and skeletal defects. Maternal food intake decreased during treatment at 250 mg/kg/day and increased at ≥125 mg/kg/day after treatment. Maternal body weight (GD 9–30), weight gain during treatment, gravid uterine weight, and number of ovarian corpora lutea decreased at 250 mg/kg/day. In contrast, maternal corrected gestational weight gain increased at ≥125 mg/kg/day. Maternal liver weight was not affected. Relative (but not absolute) maternal kidney weight increased at 250 mg/kg/day, and microscopic evaluation revealed no treatment-related renal pathology. At 250 mg/kg/day, prenatal mortality was increased (90% resorptions/litter vs 6% for controls), the proportion of pregnant females with no live fetuses was increased (73% vs 0%), and live litter size was reduced (2.3 fetuses/litter vs 8.8). As a result, there were only 14 live fetuses (6 live litters) available for evaluation in the high-dose group, compared to 153–175 live fetuses (18–23 live litters) in the other groups. The percentage malformed fetuses/litter was increased at 250 mg/kg/day, primarily due to cardiovascular defects in 72% of high-dose fetuses vs 3% of controls. The most prevalent cardiovascular malformation (in terventricular septal defect) was observed in 57% of high-dose fetuses compared to 0.6% among controls. At 250 mg/kg/day, average fetal body weight/litter was 92% of the average control weight (not statistically significant). In summary, no definitive maternal or developmental toxicity was observed at 62.5 or 125 mg/kg/day BA. Mild maternal effects and severe developmental toxicity were observed at 250 mg/kg/day.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.