Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GROTEN, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by FERON, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GROTEN, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by FERON, V. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press

research-article

Subacute Toxicity of a Mixture of Nine Chemicals in Rats: Detecting Interactive Effects with a Fractionated Two-Level Factorial Design

JOHN P. GROTEN, ERIC D. SCHOEN*, PETER J. VAN BLADEREN, C. FRIEKE KUPER, JOB A. VAN ZORGE{dagger} and VICTOR J. FERON

Division of Toxicology, TNO Nutrition and Food Research Institute Zeist *Department of Applied Statistics, TNO Institute of Applied Physics Delft {dagger}Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning, and Environment The Hague, The Netherlands

Received February 1, 1996; accepted December 2, 1996

The present study was intended (1) to find out whether simultaneous administration of nine chemicals at a concentration equal to the "no-observed-adverse-effect level" (NOAEL) for each of them would result in a NOAEL for the combination and (2) to test the usefulness of fractionated factorial models to detect possible interactions between chemicals in the mixture. A 4-week oral/ inhalatory study in male Wistar rats was performed in which the toxicity (clinical chemistry, hematology, biochemistry, and pathology) of combinations of the nine compounds was examined. The study comprised 20 groups, 4 groups in the main part (n = 8) and 16 groups in the satellite part (n =5). In the main study, the rats were simultaneously exposed to mixtures of all nine chemicals [dichloromethane, formaldehyde, aspirin, di(2-ethylhexyl)phtha-late, cadmium chloride, stannous chloride, butyl hydroxyanisol, loperamide, and spermine] at concentrations equal to the "minimum-observed-adverse-effect level" (MOAEL), NOAEL, or 1/3NOAEL. In the satellite study the rats were simultaneously exposed to combinations of maximally five compounds at their MOAEL. These combinations jointly comprise a two-level factorial design with nine factors (=9 chemicals) in 16 experimental groups (1/32 fraction of a complete study). In the main part many effects on hematology and clinical chemistry were encountered at the MOAEL. In addition, rats of the MOAEL group showed hyperpla-sia of the transitional epithelium and/or squamous metaplasia of the respiratory epithelium in the nose. Only very few adverse effects were encountered in the NOAEL group. For most of the end points chosen, the factorial analysis revealed main effects of the individual compounds and interactions (cases of nonadditivity) between the compounds. Despite all restrictions and pitfalls that are associated with the use of fractionated factorial designs, the present study shows the usefulness of this type of factorial design to study the joint adverse effects of defined chemical mixtures at effect levels. It was concluded that simultaneous exposure to these nine chemicals does not constitute an evidently increased hazard compared to exposure to each of the chemicals separately, provided the exposure level of each chemical in the mixture is at most similar to or lower than its own NOAEL.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.