Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baird, S. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baird, S. J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 Oxford University Press

other

Evaluation of Effect Profiles: Functional Observational Battery Outcomes

Sandra J. S. Baird*,1, Paul J. Catalano{dagger}, Louise M. Ryan{dagger} and John S. Evans*

*Program in Environmental Health and Public Policy, Harvard School of Public Health Boston, Massachusetts 02115 {dagger}Harvard School of Public Health and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Received November 14, 1996; accepted July 23, 1997

The Functional Observational Battery (FOB) is a neurotoxicity screening assay composed of 25–30 descriptive, scalar, binary, and continuous endpoints. These outcomes have been grouped into six biologically logical domains as a means to interpret the neuroactive properties of tested chemicals (V. C. Moser, 1992, J. Am. Goll. Toxicol. 10(6), 661–669). However, no data-based exploration of these functional domains has been done. We investigated the degree to which experimental data correspond to the domain groupings by examining severity scores from 10 chemicals tested using a standardized protocol for acute exposure (V. C. Moser et al., 1995, J. Toxicol Environ. Health 45, 173–210) and identifying endpoint groupings (factors) that best describe the interrelationships in the data, allowing a statistical assessment of whether the FOB endpoints break into domains. We also used a standard measure of bivariate association to confirm the results of the factor analysis. Our results show that while there are clear relationships among variables that compose some domains, there is often substantial correlation among endpoints in different domains. In addition, we investigated a related issue concerning the relative power of the chosen endpoint groupings for identifying significant domain effects. Results from a randomization analysis of the 10 chemicals suggest that the neurophysiologic domain structuring may provide some degree of statistical efficiency for identifying effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.