Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (32)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ashani, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Allon, N.
Right arrow Articles by Ashani, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Prophylaxis against Soman Inhalation Toxicity in Guinea Pigs by Pretreatment Alone with Human Serum Butyrylcholinesterase1

Nahum Allon, Lily Raveh, Eran Gilat, Ephraim Cohen2, Jacob Grunwald and Yacov Ashani3

Israel Institute for Biological Research P.O. Box 19, Ness-Ziona, Israel

Received November 17, 1997; accepted March 30, 1998

Human butyrylcholinesterase (HuBChE) has previously been shown to protect mice, rats, and monkeys against multiple lethal toxic doses of organophosphorus (OP) anticholinesterases that were challenged by iv bolus injections. This study examines the concept of using a cholinesterase scavenger as a prophylactic measure against inhalation toxicity, which is the more realistic simulation of exposure to volatile OPs. HuBChE-treated awake guinea pigs were exposed to controlled concentration of soman vapors ranging from 417 to 430 µg/liter, for 45 to 70 s. The correlation between the inhibition of circulating HuBChE and the dose of soman administered by sequential iv injections and by respiratory exposure indicated that the fraction of the inhaled dose of soman that reached the blood was 0.29. HuBChE to soman molar ratio of 0.11 was sufficient to prevent the manifestation of toxic signs in guinea pigs following exposure to 2.17 × the inhaled LD50 dose of soman (ILD50, 101 µg/kg). A slight increase in HuBChE:soman ratio (0.15) produced sign-free animals after two sequential respiratory exposures with a cumulative dose of 4.5 × ILD50. Protection was exceptionally high and far superior to the currently used traditional approach that consisted of pretreatment with pyridostigmine and postexposure combined administration of atropine, benactyzine, and an oxime reactivator. Quantitative analysis of the results suggests that in vivo sequestration of soman, and presumably other OPs, by exogenously administered HuBChE, is independent of the species used or the route of challenge entry. This assuring conclusion significantly expands the database of the bioscavenger strategy that now offers a dependable extrapolation from animals to human.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
N. Allon, I. Rabinovitz, E. Manistersky, B. A. Weissman, and E. Grauer
Acute and Long-Lasting Cardiac Changes Following a Single Whole-Body Exposure to Sarin Vapor in Rats
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2005; 87(2): 385 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
Y. Ashani and S. Pistinner
Estimation of the Upper Limit of Human Butyrylcholinesterase Dose Required for Protection against Organophosphates Toxicity: a Mathematically Based Toxicokinetic Model
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 358 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Nicolet, O. Lockridge, P. Masson, J. C. Fontecilla-Camps, and F. Nachon
Crystal Structure of Human Butyrylcholinesterase and of Its Complexes with Substrate and Products
J. Biol. Chem., October 17, 2003; 278(42): 41141 - 41147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.