Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Patierno, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Singh, J.
Right arrow Articles by Patierno, S. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

other

Differential Sensitivity of Chromium-Mediated DNA Interstrand Crosslinks and DNA-Protein Crosslinks to Disruption by Alkali and EDTA

Jatinder Singh, Laura C. Bridgewater and Steven R. Patierno1

Department of Pharmacology, The George Washington University Medical Center Washington, DC 20037

Received January 23, 1998; accepted May 7, 1998

Some compounds of hexavalent chromium are well-established carcinogens. Chromium enters mammalian cells in the hexavalent form and is reduced to chromium(III). Treatment of purified DNA with chromium(III) produces DNA-DNA inter-strand crosslinks (DDC) which obstruct the progression of DNA polymerases in vitro. DDC were also detected in chromate-treated cultured normal human lung cells using the renaturing agarose gel electrophoresis (RAGE) assay and correlated with base-specific inhibition of DNA replication. Curiously, DDC have gone undetected in studies of cultured cells using the alkaline elution (AE) technique, whereas chromium-mediated DNA-protein crosslinks (DPC) were readily detected by AE. We tested the hypothesis that AE conditions [60 mM tetraethyl ammonium hydroxide (TEA), 20 mM EDTA, pH 12.6, for 16 h at room temperature] dissociate DDC but not DPC using chromium(III)-treated plasmid DNA and the RAGE assay. Dose-dependent chromium-induced DDC were unaffected by TEA (pH 11.8) alone or by more rigorous alkaline denaturation conditions (200 mM NaOH, pH 13.5, for 16 h). DDC were, however, completely disrupted by EDTA (pH 12.6) alone or the combination of TEA and EDTA (pH 12.6). In contrast, DPC remained largely intact under these conditions. Therefore, past AE-based studies which have failed to detect chromium-induced DDC do not prove the absence of this lesion. AE may not be suitable for detecting DDC induced by EDTA-chelatable agents such as metals.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
L. Ha, S. Ceryak, and S. R. Patierno
Generation of S phase-dependent DNA double-strand breaks by Cr(VI) exposure: involvement of ATM in Cr(VI) induction of {gamma}-H2AX
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2265 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Ha, S. Ceryak, and S. R. Patierno
Chromium (VI) Activates Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) Protein. REQUIREMENT OF ATM FOR BOTH APOPTOSIS AND RECOVERY FROM TERMINAL GROWTH ARREST
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17885 - 17894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
D. E. Pritchard, S. Ceryak, L. Ha, J. L. Fornsaglio, S. K. Hartman, T. J. O'Brien, and S. R. Patierno
Mechanism of Apoptosis and Determination of Cellular Fate in Chromium(VI)-exposed Populations of Telomerase-immortalized Human Fibroblasts
Cell Growth Differ., October 1, 2001; 12(10): 487 - 496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
D. E. Pritchard, J. Singh, D. L. Carlisle, and S. R. Patierno
Cyclosporin A inhibits chromium(VI)-induced apoptosis and mitochondrial cytochrome c release and restores clonogenic survival in CHO cells
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2000; 21(11): 2027 - 2033.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.