Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bahnemann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jäckh, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bahnemann, R.
Right arrow Articles by Jäckh, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

Different Patterns of Kidney Toxicity after Subacute Administration of Na-Nitrilotriacetic Acid and Fe-Nitrilotriacetic Acid to Wistar Rats

R. Bahnemann, E. Leibold, B. Kittel, W. Mellert and R. Jäckh

Department of Toxicology, BASF Aktiengesellschaft 67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany

Received December 5, 1997; accepted May 19, 1998

Na-nitrilotriacetic acid (Na3NTA) and Fe-nitrikrtriacetic acid (FeNTA) have both been described to cause tumors in the urinary tract of rodents. However, these effects were observed using different modes of administration at extremely different dose levels and explained by different mechanisms. Whereas FeNTA causes an iron overload of cells and is genotoxic in various assays, Na3NTA is predominantly bound to zinc in vivo and thereby causes cytotoxic effects in the urinary tract In contrast to FeNTA, Na3NTA requires high dose levels to produce tumors. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Na3NTA and FeNTA on cellular proliferation, histopathology, lipid peroxidation, and 8-OH-2'-deoxyguanosine levels in the kidneys as well as on the urinary excretion of Ca, Fe, and Zn. For evaluation of DNA synthesis both compounds were administered for 1 or 4 weeks to 14-week-old male Wistar rats at a tumor causing dose, Na3NTA via the diet at 150 ppm and 20,000 ppm ({small tilde}9 and ~1000 mg/kg/day) and FeNTA ip at 25 mg/kg/day. An osmotic minipump, containing 20 mg/ml BrdU, was implanted sub-cutaneously 7 days before necropsy. Na3NTA showed nearly no effect on DNA replication after 1 week but a strong reaction after 4 weeks. The increase was 10- to 18-fold in different renal compartments. The enhancement of proliferation in the proximal tubules was nearly twice that in the distal tubules. In contrast, FeNTA caused DNA replication during the first week, and this was restricted to the proximal tubules. After 4 weeks there was an 18-fold increase in the outer stripe and no effect in the inner stripe of the outer medulla. The data presented give evidence to the assumption that both substances increase cell proliferation as a compensatory mechanism, causing different pattern of tubular proliferation in terms of time course and affected cell types. Both Na3NTA at 20,000 ppm and FeNTA led to increased lipid peroxidation, whereas increased levels of 8-OH-2'-deoxyguanosine were observed only after treatment with FeNTA. Urinary excretion of Zn was increased 30-fold after administration of 20,000 ppm Na3NTA but only 2-fold after administration of FeNTA. Urinary excretion of Ca and Fe remained unchanged after treatment with either Na3NTA and FeNTA. These results show that the Na3NTA-related proliferative effects are not mediated by an internal formation of FeNTA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
E Leibold, K Deckardt, W Mellert, B Potthoff-Karl, O Grundler, and R Jackh
NTA and Fe(III)NTA: differential patterns of renal toxicity in subchronic studies
Human and Experimental Toxicology, August 1, 2002; 21(8): 445 - 452.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.