Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ratra, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ratra, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 Oxford University Press

research-article

Effects of Induction and Inhibition of Cytochromes P450 on the Hepatotoxicity of Methapyrilene

G. S. Ratra, S. Cottrell and C. J. Powell1

Department of Toxicology, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom

Received December 16, 1997; accepted May 29, 1998

The mechanisms by which the antihistamine drug methapyrilene causes acute periportal hepatotoxicity in rats are not yet elucidated. This study investigated the effects of modulators of cytochrome P450 (CYP) activity on the hepatotoxicity of methapyrilene and also the effect of methapyrilene on hepatic CYP. Pretreatment of male Han Wistar rats with ß-naphthoflavone, phenobarbitone, butylated hydroxytoluene, piperonyl butoxide, Aroclor 1254, or cobalt protoporphyrin IX, agents known to modify hepatic CYP, all afforded some degree of protection against a hepatotoxic dose of methapyrilene (150 mg/kg x 3 days p.o.), as assessed by clinical chemistry and histology. Total hepatic CYP depletion by cobalt protoporphyrin IX treatment indicated CYP-mediated bioactivation was a prerequisite for methapyrilene-induced hepatotoxicity. Protection against hepatic damage was strongly associated with ß-naphthoflavone induction of CYP1A and phenobarbitone-associated CYP2B induction. However, the role of CYP3A, which is constitutively expressed in the liver and induced by piperonyl butoxide, butylated hydroxytoluene, or Aroclor 1254, was unclear. Modulation of FAD monooxgenase activity by methimazole pretreatment was not associated with increased methapyrilene-induced hepatotoxicity. Methapyrilene treatment alone specifically decreased microsomal enzyme activity markers for CYP2C11, CYP3A, and CYP2A and pretreatment with all the hepatic enzyme-inducing agents specifically prevented the loss of CYP2C11. Together this suggested that CYP2C11 was responsible for the suicide substrate bioactivation of methapyrilene and the toxicologic outcome largely relied upon an abundance of detoxifying enzymes present in the liver.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
E. E. Graham, R. J. Walsh, C. M. Hirst, J. L. Maggs, S. Martin, M. J. Wild, I. D. Wilson, J. R. Harding, J. G. Kenna, R. M. Peter, et al.
Identification of the Thiophene Ring of Methapyrilene as a Novel Bioactivation-Dependent Hepatic Toxicophore
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2008; 326(2): 657 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
H. K. Hamadeh, B. L. Knight, A. C. Haugen, S. Sieber, R. P. Amin, P. R. Bushel, R. Stoll, K. Blanchard, S. Jayadev, R. W. Tennant, et al.
Methapyrilene Toxicity: Anchorage of Pathologic Observations to Gene Expression Alterations
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2002; 30(4): 470 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.