Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PEREIRA, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by STONER, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by PEREIRA, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by STONER, G. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Oxford University Press

research-article

Comparison of Rat Liver Foci Assay and Strain A Mouse Lung Tumor Assay to Detect Carcinogens: A Review1

MICHAEL A. PEREIRA* and GARY D. STONER{dagger}

*U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Effects Research Laboratory 26 W. St. Clair Street, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268 {dagger}Department of Pathology, Medical College of Ohio Toledo, Ohio 43614

Comparison of Rat Liver Foci Assay and Strain A Mouse Lung Tumor Assay to Detect Carcinogens: A Review. PEREIRA, M. A., AND STONER, G. D. (1985). Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 5, 688–699. A comparison was performed of the results reported in the literature of chemicals tested in the rat liver foci assay and/or in the strain A lung tumor assay to the results of the chemicals tested in long-term carcinogenicity bioassays. The rat liver foci assay was sensitive to 69% of 54 compounds found to be carcinogenic in long-term bioassays and the strain A lung tumor assay to 54% of 93 carcinogens. None of 10 compounds found to be noncarcinogenic in long-term bioassays were active in the rat liver foci assay, while 7 of 23 noncarcinogens (30%) were active in the lung tumor assay. Ten of the 17 carcinogens negative in the rat liver foci assay are believed to exhibit tumor-promoting activity; 3 are direct-acting alkylating agents (dimethylsulfate, epichlorohydrin, and ß-propiolactone); and the remaining 3 are azobenzene, 1,2-dibromoethane, and thioacetamide. Thirty-two of the 43 carcinogens negative in the lung tumor assay were active in either (1) the mouse liver only, (2) the rat and not in the mouse, or (3) in both the rat and mouse liver but not in other organs of the mouse. It is proposed that additional investigations be undertaken to further evaluate the rat liver foci assay and the strain A mouse lung tumor assay as short-term in vivo tests for the demonstration of the carcinogenic potential of genotoxic (mutagenic) chemicals and environmental samples of complex mixtures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.