Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEPTUN, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by IRONS, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by NEPTUN, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by IRONS, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1985 Oxford University Press

other

Effect of Sampling Site and Collection Method on Variations in Baseline Clinical Pathology Parameters in Fischer-344 Rats

1. Clinical Chemistry

DOUGLAS A. NEPTUN*, CORRIE N. SMITH* and RICHARD D. IRONS{dagger}

*Departments of Experimental Pathology and Toxicology, Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology P.O. Box 12137 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 {dagger}Departments of Cell Biology, Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology P.O. Box 12137 Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

An analysis of the influence of blood sampling site and collection method on clinical chemistry parameters was conducted in male Fischer-344 rats. Sampling sites compared included the right ventricle, aorta, vena cava, retroorbital sinus, and tail. Methods of collection included Vacutainer (3 ml sample), syringe (exsanguination), and capillary tube. Nineteen frequently measured clinical chemistry procedures were determined, including serum enzymes, cholesterol, and triglycerides. Significant differences were noted for almost every parameter as a function of sampling site. Samples collected from the right ventricle with a Vacutainer produced the most representative results for most but not all procedures when compared to the overall mean (for all methods). The largest differences were encountered in samples obtained from tail and retroorbital plexus. Exanguination also resulted in significant differences for some parameters when compared to smaller sample volumes obtained from the same site. It was concluded that sampling site and collection method can be a major source of variation in clinical chemistry measurements, and in selection of an appropriate method, one should consider Which parameters are likely to be of major interest.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.