Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoet, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nemery, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoet, P. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nemery, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences, Vol 52, 209-216, Copyright © 1999 by Society of Toxicology


ARTICLES

In vitro cytotoxicity of textile paint components linked to the "Ardystil syndrome"

PH Hoet, LP Gilissen, M Leyva and B Nemery
Laboratory of Pneumology (Unit of Lung Toxicology), K.U. Leuven, Belgium.

The spraying of a paint formula (Acramin F system) had led to severe pulmonary disease in textile printing sprayers in Spain and Algeria (Ardystil syndrome). In order to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the toxicity of this paint and its main polymeric components, Acramin FWR, Acramin FWN, Acrafix FHN, and Acramoll W, we have undertaken studies using a battery of different cell-types and assessing in vitro cytotoxicity by measuring LDH leakage. This study shows that, as in in vivo studies, the three polycationic paint components, Acramin FWR (a polyurea), Acramin FWN (a polyamide-amine), and Acrafix FHN (a polyamine) exhibited considerable cytotoxicity (LC50 generally below 100 microg/ml for an incubation of 20-24 h) in vitro, while Acramoll W, which is not a polycation, was almost non-toxic (in the concentration range tested). The cytotoxicity was comparable in primary cultures of rat and human type II pneumocytes and alveolar macrophages as well as in the pulmonary cell line A549 and the hepatic cell line HepG2. In human erythrocytes, the toxicity was less pronounced. We speculate that the multiple positive charges play an important role in the toxic mechanism. It is concluded that Acramin FWR and Acramin FWN have similar intrinsic toxicity and that these polymeric compounds, which have no irritant properties or systemic toxicity when given orally, exert a high, unexpected, degree of cytotoxicity.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. H. J. Vernooy, G. M. Moller, R. J. van Suylen, M. P. van Spijk, R. H. E. Cloots, P. H. Hoet, H. J. Pennings, and E. F. M. Wouters
Increased Granzyme A Expression in Type II Pneumocytes of Patients with Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2007; 175(5): 464 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
H. Xu, D. Dinsdale, B. Nemery, and P. H.M. Hoet
Role of Residual Additives in the Cytotoxicity and Cytokine Release Caused by Polyvinyl Chloride Particles in Pulmonary Cell Cultures
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2003; 72(1): 92 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. Nemmar, M. F. Hoylaerts, P. H. M. Hoet, D. Dinsdale, T. Smith, H. Xu, J. Vermylen, and B. Nemery
Ultrafine Particles Affect Experimental Thrombosis in an In Vivo Hamster Model
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2002; 166(7): 998 - 1004.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.