Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Klaunig, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Klaunig, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 54, 312-321 (2000)
Copyright © 2000 by the Society of Toxicology

Comparative in Vivo Hepatic Effects of Di-Isononyl Phthalate (DINP) and Related C7–C11 Dialkyl Phthalates on Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication (GJIC), Peroxisomal Beta-Oxidation (PBOX), and DNA Synthesis in Rat and Mouse Liver

Jacqueline H. Smith*, Jason S. Isenberg{dagger}, George Pugh, Jr.*, Lisa M. Kamendulis{dagger}, David Ackley{dagger}, Arthur W. Lington* and James E. Klaunig{dagger},1

* Exxon Biomedical Sciences, Inc., East Millstone, New Jersey 08875; and {dagger} Division of Toxicology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202

The short-term hepatic effects of DINP (CAS 68515-48-0, designated DINP-1) in rats and mice were evaluated at tumorigenic and nontumorigenic doses from previous chronic studies. Groups of male F344 rats were fed diets with DINP-1 at concentrations of 0, 1000, or 12,000 ppm and male B6C3F1 mice at 0, 500, or 6000 ppm DINP-1. After 2 or 4 weeks of treatment, changes in liver weight, gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC), peroxisomal beta-oxidation (PBOX), and replicative DNA synthesis were examined. In addition, hepatic and serum concentrations of the parent compound and major metabolites were determined. Relative to controls in both species, increased liver weight and PBOX at the high dose of DINP-1 were consistent with peroxisomal proliferation. Hepatic GJIC was inhibited and DNA synthesis was increased at the high dose of DINP-1, which is also consistent with the tumorigenic response in rats and mice reported in other chronic studies at these doses. These hepatic effects were not observed at the low doses of DINP-1. At comparable low doses of DINP-1 in other chronic studies, no liver tumors were observed in rats and mice. The monoester metabolite (MINP-1) was detected in the liver at greater concentrations in mice than rats. This result is also consistent with the dose-response observations in rat and mouse chronic studies. Additionally, other structurally similar dialkyl phthalate esters ranging from C7 to C11 were evaluated using a similar protocol for comparison to DINP-1; these included an alternative isomeric form of DINP (DINP-A), di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP), di-isoheptyl phthalate (DIHP), di-heptyl, nonyl undecyl phthalate (D711P), and di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP). Collectively, these data indicate that in rats and mice, DINP-1 and other C7–C11 phthalates exhibit a threshold for inducing hepatic cellular events. Further, where previous chronic data were available for these compounds, these phthalates elicited hepatic effects at doses that correlated with the tumorigenic response. Overall, these studies suggest a good correlation between the inhibition of GJIC when compared with the data on production of liver tumors in chronic studies.

Key Words: di-isononyl phthalate (DINP); di-isodecyl phthalate (DIDP); di-isoheptyl phthalate (DIHP); di-n-octyl phthalate (DNOP); di-heptyl, nonyl, undecyl phthalate (D711P); DNA synthesis; gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC); in situ dye transfer (ISDT); peroxisome proliferation; phthalate esters; rodent liver.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. S. Kimbell
Nasal Dosimetry of Inhaled Gases and Particles: Where Do Inhaled Agents Go in the Nose?
Toxicol Pathol, April 1, 2006; 34(3): 270 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. T. Bility, J. T. Thompson, R. H. McKee, R. M. David, J. H. Butala, J. P. Vanden Heuvel, and J. M. Peters
Activation of Mouse and Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) by Phthalate Monoesters
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 170 - 182.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. B. Morris, P. T. Symanowicz, J. E. Olsen, R. S. Thrall, M. M. Cloutier, and A. K. Hubbard
Immediate sensory nerve-mediated respiratory responses to irritants in healthy and allergic airway-diseased mice
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2003; 94(4): 1563 - 1571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
K. A. Warner, M. J. Fernstrom, and R. J. Ruch
Inhibition of Mouse Hepatocyte Gap Junctional Intercellular Communication by Phenobarbital Correlates with Strain-Specific Hepatocarcinogenesis
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2003; 71(2): 190 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. Pugh Jr., J. S. Isenberg, L. M. Kamendulis, D. C. Ackley, L. J. Clare, R. Brown, A. W. Lington, J. H. Smith, and J. E. Klaunig
Effects of Di-isononyl Phthalate, Di-2-ethylhexyl Phthalate, and Clofibrate in Cynomolgus Monkeys
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2000; 56(1): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.