Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DECAPRIO, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by KAMINSKY, L. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DECAPRIO, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by KAMINSKY, L. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1986 Oxford University Press

research-article

Subchronic Oral Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the Guinea Pig: Comparisons with a PCB-Containing Transformer Fluid Pyrolysate

ANTHONY P. DECAPRIO1, DONALD N. MCMARTIN2, PATRICK W. O'KEEFE, ROBERT REJ, JAY B. SILKWORTH and LAURENCE S. KAMINSKY

Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research, New York State Department of Health Albany, New York 12201

Subchronic Oral Toxicity of 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin in the Guinea Pig: Comparisons with a PCB-Containing Transformer Fluid Pyrolysate. DECAPRIO, A. P., MCMARTIN, D. N., O'KEEFE, P. W., REJ, R., SILKWORTH, J. B., AND KAMINSKY, L. S. (1986). Fundam. Appl. Taxicol. 6,454–463. In contrast to the well-characterized acute toxicity of the environmental contaminant 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (2,3,7,8-TCDD) in the guinea pig, the effects of prolonged po exposure in this species are unknown. The present report describes the results of administration to guinea pigs of 2,3,7,8-TCDD in the feed at levels of 0,2, 10, 76, or 430 ppt for up to 90 days. Additional aims were to examine recovery following prolonged 2,3,7,8-TCDD exposure in the guinea pig and to generate data to facilitate comparison of the previously reported toxicity of a transformer fluid pyrolysate with that of pure 2,3,7,8-TCDD. Animals receiving 430 pot 2,3,7,8-TCDD exhibited body weight loss, thymic atrophy, liver enlargement, and 60% mortality by Day 46 (males) and by Day 60 (females), when surviving animals in this group were sacrificed. Total 2,3,7,8-TCDD consumption was approximately 1.3 and 1.9 µg/kg, respectively. Animals receiving 76 ppt 2,3,7,8-TCDD for 90 days (total 0.44 µg/kg) exhibited a decreased rate of body weight gain and increased relative (to body) liver weights. Male animals also displayed a reduction in relative thymus weights and elevated serum triglycerides, while females exhibited hepatocellular cytoplasmic inclusion bodies and lowered serum alanine arninotransferase activities. Toxic effects were generally similar to those observed after acute 2,3,7,8-TCDD administration. No dose-related alterations were seen in animals receiving either 10 ppt (total 0.06 µg/kg) or 2 ppt (total 0.01 µg/kg) for 90 days, establishing a no-observed-effect level of approximately 0.65 ng 2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg/day. In the recovery study, groups of guinea pigs were administered 430 ppt 2,3,7,8-TCDD for 11,21, or 35 days and then allowed to recover for an additional 79,69, or 55 days, respectively. Treatment-related mortality in each group was 0, 10, and 70%, respectively, by Day 90. An effective LD5O of 0.8 µg 2,3,7,8-TCDD/kg for prolonged exposure was calculated on the basis of these results, a value lower than those previously reported from this laboratory for acute exposure. The results also suggested a possible lowering of the body weight "set point" following 2,3,7,8- TCDD exposure. Comparison of the present findings with those previously reported for a trans former fluid pyrolysate containing a mixture of polychlorinated aromatic species indicated both a greater variety of toxic effects and flatter dose-response relationships for the pyrolysate in the guinea pig.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.