Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Overton, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Overton, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 64, 122-134 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 by the Society of Toxicology


RESPIRATORY TOXICOLOGY

Dosimetry Modeling of Inhaled Formaldehyde: The Human Respiratory Tract

John H. Overton*,1, Julia S. Kimbell{dagger} and Frederick J. Miller{dagger}

* Experimental Toxicology Division, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; and {dagger} CIIT Centers for Health Research, P.O. Box 12137, 6 Davis Drive, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Formaldehyde (HCHO), which has been shown to be a nasal carcinogen in rats and mice, is used widely and extensively in various manufacturing processes. Studies in rhesus monkeys suggest that the lower respiratory tract may be at risk and some epidemiologic studies have reported an increase in lung cancer associated with HCHO; other studies have not. Thus, an assessment of possible human risk to HCHO exposure based on dosimetry information throughout the respiratory tract (RT) is desirable. To obtain dosimetry estimates for a risk assessment, two types of models were used. The first model (which is the subject of another investigation) used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to estimate local fluxes in a 3-dimensional model of the nasal region. The subject of the present investigation (the second model) applied a 1-dimensional equation of mass transport to each generation of an adult human symmetric, bifurcating Weibel-type RT anatomical model, augmented by an upper respiratory tract. The two types of modeling approaches were made consistent by requiring that the 1-dimensional version of the nasal passages have the same inspiratory air-flow rate and uptake during inspiration as the CFD simulations for 4 daily human activity levels. Results obtained include the following: (1) More than 95% of the inhaled HCHO is predicted to be retained by the RT. (2) The CFD predictions for inspiration, modified to account for the difference in inspiration and complete breath times, are a good approximation to uptake in the nasal airways during a single breath. (3) In the lower respiratory tract, flux is predicted to increase for several generations and then decrease rapidly. (4) Compared to first pulmonary region generation fluxes, the first few tracheobronchial generations fluxes are over 1000 times larger. Further, there is essentially no flux in the alveolar sacs. (5) Predicted fluxes based on the 1-dimensional model are presented that can be used in a biologically based dose-response model for human carcinogenesis. Use of these fluxes will reduce uncertainty in a risk assessment for formaldehyde carcinogenicity.

Key Words: formaldehyde; upper respiratory tract; respiratory tract; dosimetry modeling; computational fluid dynamics; mass transport; nasal airway.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN OCCUP HYGHome page
K. S. Crump, C. Chen, J. F. Fox, C. Van Landingham, and R. Subramaniam
Sensitivity Analysis of Biologically Motivated Model for Formaldehyde-Induced Respiratory Cancer in Humans
Ann. Hyg., July 24, 2008; (2008) men038v3.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
M. Yoon, M. C. Madden, and H. A. Barton
Developmental Expression of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase in Rat: a Comparison of Liver and Lung Development
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2006; 89(2): 386 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. B. Conolly, J. S. Kimbell, D. Janszen, P. M. Schlosser, D. Kalisak, J. Preston, and F. J. Miller
Human Respiratory Tract Cancer Risks of Inhaled Formaldehyde: Dose-Response Predictions Derived From Biologically-Motivated Computational Modeling of a Combined Rodent and Human Dataset
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2004; 82(1): 279 - 296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. S. Kimbell, J. H. Overton, R. P. Subramaniam, P. M. Schlosser, K. T. Morgan, R. B. Conolly, and F. J. Miller
Dosimetry Modeling of Inhaled Formaldehyde: Binning Nasal Flux Predictions for Quantitative Risk Assessment
Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2001; 64(1): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.