Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, J. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 68, 51-58 (2002)
Copyright © 2002 by the Society of Toxicology


CARCINOGENICITY

Effects of Phenobarbital on DNA Methylation in GC-Rich Regions of Hepatic DNA from Mice That Exhibit Different Levels of Susceptibility to Liver Tumorigenesis

Rebecca E. Watson and Jay I. Goodman,1

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, B440 Life Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mechanism involved in transcriptional control and altered patterns of methylation may lead to the aberrant gene expression contributing to carcinogenesis. Three groups of mice were used in the current study: the relatively liver-tumor-sensitive C3H/He strain and B6C3F1 stock (C57BL/6xC3H/He), as well as the relatively resistant C57BL/6 strain. For a 2-week period, animals from each group were given drinking water containing a tumor-promoting dose of phenobarbital (PB), a nongenotoxic rodent carcinogen. Methylation-sensitive restriction digests using HpaII or MspI were followed by PCR amplification using an arbitrary primer or primer pair, binding preferentially to guanine and cytysine (GC)-rich regions of DNA, including CpG islands. This procedure allows for assessment of methylation at the internal and/or external cytosine of the 5`-CCGG-3` sites recognized by MspI and HpaII. Results with the single primer indicated marked differences in PB-induced hypermethylation at external and internal cytosines of 5`-CCGG-3` sites: C3H/He >> B6C3F1 > C57BL/6. Results with the arbitrary primer pair indicated PB-induced hypermethylation at the external cytosine of 5`-CCGG-3` site: B6C3F1 > C3H/He, and a low level of hypomethylation at internal and external cytosine sites in C57BL/6. Thus, there was a clear indication of more methylation changes in GC-rich regions of DNA, primarily hypermethylation, in the tumor-sensitive groups of mice in response to PB treatment. Therefore, this study supports our hypothesis that the capacity to maintain normal methylation patterns is related inversely to tumor susceptibility.

Key Words: B6C3F1; carcinogenesis; C3H/He; C57BL/6; CpG islands; DNA methylation; GC-rich regions; liver; non-CpG methylation; phenobarbital; susceptibility; tumorigenesis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. M. Phillips and J. I. Goodman
Identification of Genes that May Play Critical Roles in Phenobarbital (PB)-Induced Liver Tumorigenesis due to Altered DNA Methylation
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2008; 104(1): 86 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. M. Phillips, Y. Yamamoto, M. Negishi, R. R. Maronpot, and J. I. Goodman
Orphan Nuclear Receptor Constitutive Active/Androstane Receptor-Mediated Alterations in DNA Methylation during Phenobarbital Promotion of Liver Tumorigenesis
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2007; 96(1): 72 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
J. W. Allen, D. C. Wolf, M. H. George, S. D. Hester, G. Sun, S.-F. Thai, D. A. Delker, T. Moore, C. Jones, G. Nelson, et al.
Toxicity Profiles in Mice Treated with Hepatotumorigenic and Non-Hepatotumorigenic Triazole Conazole Fungicides: Propiconazole, Triadimefon, and Myclobutanil
Toxicol Pathol, December 1, 2006; 34(7): 853 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
V. P. Tryndyak, L. Muskhelishvili, O. Kovalchuk, R. Rodriguez-Juarez, B. Montgomery, M. I. Churchwell, S. A. Ross, F. A. Beland, and I. P. Pogribny
Effect of long-term tamoxifen exposure on genotoxic and epigenetic changes in rat liver: implications for tamoxifen-induced hepatocarcinogenesis
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2006; 27(8): 1713 - 1720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. N. Bachman, J. M. Phillips, and J. I. Goodman
Phenobarbital Induces Progressive Patterns of GC-Rich and Gene-Specific Altered DNA Methylation in the Liver of Tumor-Prone B6C3F1 Mice
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2006; 91(2): 393 - 405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
A. N. Bachman, L. M. Kamendulis, and J. I. Goodman
Diethanolamine and Phenobarbital Produce an Altered Pattern of Methylation in GC-Rich Regions of DNA in B6C3F1 Mouse Hepatocytes Similar to That Resulting from Choline Deficiency
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2006; 90(2): 317 - 325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. E. Watson, J. M. McKim, G. L. Cockerell, and J. I. Goodman
The Value of DNA Methylation Analysis in Basic, Initial Toxicity Assessments
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2004; 79(1): 178 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
R. E. Watson, G. M. Curtin, D. J. Doolittle, and J. I. Goodman
Progressive Alterations in Global and GC-Rich DNA Methylation during Tumorigenesis
Toxicol. Sci., October 1, 2003; 75(2): 289 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.