Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on January 21, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
77/2/334    most recent
kfh024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bressler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cheong, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bressler, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences 77, 334-340 (2004)
Copyright © 2004 by the Society of Toxicology


NEUROTOXICOLOGY

Different Mechanisms Mediate Uptake of Lead in a Rat Astroglial Cell Line

Jae Hoon Cheong*,{dagger},{ddagger}, Desmond Bannon*,{dagger},1, Luisa Olivi{dagger}, Yongbae Kim*,§ and Joseph Bressler*,{dagger},2

* Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205; {dagger} Kennedy-Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, 21205; {ddagger} School of Pharmacy, Sahmyook University, Seoul, Korea; § Department of Preventive Medicine, Soonchunhyan University, Chunan City, Korea; and Department of Neurology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, 707 North Broadway, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

The mechanism by which lead (Pb) enters astrocytes was examined in a rat astroglial cell line in order to characterize specific pathways for transport. Pb uptake was saturable at pH 5.5 and 7.4, although quantitative differences existed in the Michaelis-Menten constants. At pH 7.4, the Vmax and Km were 2700 fmoles/mg protein/min and 13.4 µM, respectively, whereas the Vmax and Km were 329 fmoles/mg and 8.2 µM in the buffer at pH 5.5, respectively. The presence of extracellular iron inhibited uptake in a buffer at pH 5.5 but not at pH 7.4. Cells treated with the iron chelator deferoxamine displayed higher levels of the iron transporter divalent metal transporter 1 (DMT1) mRNA and protein, and consistent with increased DMT1 expression, the treated cells displayed greater uptake of Pb in the buffer at pH 5.5 but not at pH 7.4. Alternatively, at pH 7.4, the transport of Pb was blocked by the anion transporter inhibitor 4,4'-diisothiocyanatodihydrostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS), which bound to cell surface proteins at concentrations that were similar to those that blocked Pb uptake. DIDS did not inhibit uptake of Pb in the buffer at pH 5.5. Greater uptake of Pb was observed in a buffer containing sodium bicarbonate, which was abrogated in the presence of DIDS. In summary, the astroglial cell line displays two distinct pH-sensitive transport mechanisms for Pb.

Key Words: lead; anion; astrocytes; divalent metal transporter 1.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
S. H. Jung, L. R. DeRuisseau, A. N. Kavazis, and K. C. DeRuisseau
Plantaris muscle of aged rats demonstrates iron accumulation and altered expression of iron regulation proteins
Exp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 93(3): 407 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
J. P Bressler, L. Olivi, J. H. Cheong, Y. Kim, A. Maerten, and D. Bannon
Metal transporters in intestine and brain: their involvement in metal-associated neurotoxicities
Human and Experimental Toxicology, March 1, 2007; 26(3): 221 - 229.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.