Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on May 24, 2004
Toxicological Sciences 2004 81(1):112-120; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
81/1/112    most recent
kfh177v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slikker, W.
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slikker, W., III
Right arrow Articles by Chen, T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 81 no. 1 © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved.

N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) Increased Brain Mutations in Prenatal and Neonatal Mice but Not in the Adults

William Slikker, III*, Nan Mei{dagger} and Tao Chen{dagger},1

* College of Letters and Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024, {dagger} Division of Genetic and Reproductive Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research/US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079

Received March 9, 2004; accepted May 12, 2004

The incidence of childhood cancer is increasing. One of the most common cancers for children under 15 years of age, gliomas for example, has been reported to have increased in incidence over the last 20 years by approximately 40%. The rising trend of childhood cancer in brain may be associated with environmental exposure to genotoxins and susceptibility to mutation in early development. To investigate age-dependent mutagenic sensitivity of brain tissue to genotoxins, the Big Blue mouse model was utilized in this study. Groups of five male mice were treated with a single dose of 120 mg/kg ENU transplacentally at three days before birth (prenatal), eight days (neonate) or eighteen weeks (adult) after birth. The animals were sacrificed six weeks after the treatment. The mutant frequencies and types of mutations in the brain cII gene from ENU-treated and concurrent control mice were determined. A significant increase in mutant frequencies over control was found in the prenatal and neonatal groups whereas there was no significant difference between the adult group and its control. Molecular analysis of the mutants also indicated that the mutational spectra from the ENU-treated mice were age-dependent. The percentage of A:T->T:A transversion, the typical type of mutation induced by ENU, was inversely related to the treatment age, whereas G:C->A: T transition was the main type of mutation in the adult group, the same as the control. These results demonstrate a differential mutagenic effect of ENU on the mouse brain depending on the stages of development and suggest an enhanced susceptibility of brain cancer hazard for perinatal exposure to genotoxicants.

Key Words: ethylnitrosourea; mutagenesis; carcinogenesis; development; Big Blue mouse.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Gil-Perotin, M. Marin-Husstege, J. Li, M. Soriano-Navarro, F. Zindy, M. F. Roussel, J.-M. Garcia-Verdugo, and P. Casaccia-Bonnefil
Loss of p53 Induces Changes in the Behavior of Subventricular Zone Cells: Implication for the Genesis of Glial Tumors
J. Neurosci., January 25, 2006; 26(4): 1107 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.