Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2004
Toxicological Sciences 2004 81(2):332-343; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh213
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
81/2/332    most recent
kfh213v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerberick, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lepoittevin, J.-P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerberick, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Lepoittevin, J.-P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 81 no. 2 © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved.

Development of a Peptide Reactivity Assay for Screening Contact Allergens

G. Frank Gerberick*,1, Jeff D. Vassallo*, Ruth E. Bailey*, Joel G. Chaney*, Steve W. Morrall* and Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin{dagger}

* The Procter & Gamble Company, Miami Valley Laboratories, Cincinnati, Ohio 45253-8707, and {dagger} Université Louis Pasteur, Laboratorie de Dermatochimie, UMR 7123, Strasbourg, France

Received April 26, 2004; accepted June 22, 2004

Allergic contact dermatitis resulting from skin sensitization is a common occupational and environmental health problem. In recent years, the local lymph node assay (LLNA) has emerged as a practical option for assessing the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. In addition to accurate identification of skin sensitizers, the LLNA can also provide a reliable measure of relative sensitization potency; information that is pivotal in successful management of human health risks. However, even with the significant animal welfare benefits provided by the LLNA, there is still interest in the development of nonanimal test methods for skin sensitization testing. One characteristic of a chemical allergen is its ability to react with proteins prior to the induction of skin sensitization. The majority of chemical allergens is electrophilic and as such reacts with nucleophilic amino acids like cysteine or lysine. In order to determine if reactivity correlates with sensitization potential, 38 chemicals representing allergens of different potencies (weak to extreme) and nonsensitizers were evaluated for their ability to react with glutathione or three synthetic peptides containing either cysteine, lysine, or histidine. Following a 15-min reaction time for glutathione or a 24 h reaction period for the three synthetic peptides, the samples were analyzed by HPLC. UV detection was used to monitor the depletion of glutathione or the peptide following reaction. The results demonstrate that a significant correlation (Spearman correlation) exists between allergen potency and the depletion of glutathione (p = 0.001), lysine (p = 0.025), and cysteine (p = 0.020), but not histidine. The peptide with the highest sensitivity was cysteine (80.8%) whereas histidine was the least sensitive (11.5%). The data presented show that measuring peptide reactivity has utility for screening chemicals for their skin sensitization potency and thus potential for reducing our reliance on animal test methods.

Key Words: allergens; alternatives; skin sensitization; peptide reactivity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
M. Aleksic, E. Thain, D. Roger, O. Saib, M. Davies, J. Li, A. Aptula, and R. Zazzeroni
Reactivity Profiling: Covalent Modification of Single Nucleophile Peptides for Skin Sensitization Risk Assessment
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2009; 108(2): 401 - 411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
A. Natsch, R. Emter, and G. Ellis
Filling the Concept with Data: Integrating Data from Different In Vitro and In Silico Assays on Skin Sensitizers to Explore the Battery Approach for Animal-Free Skin Sensitization Testing
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2009; 107(1): 106 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
A. Natsch and H. Gfeller
LC-MS-Based Characterization of the Peptide Reactivity of Chemicals to Improve the In Vitro Prediction of the Skin Sensitization Potential
Toxicol. Sci., December 1, 2008; 106(2): 464 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
D. A. Basketter
Nonanimal Alternatives for Skin Sensitization: A Step Forward?
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2008; 102(1): 1 - 2.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
A. Natsch and R. Emter
Skin Sensitizers Induce Antioxidant Response Element Dependent Genes: Application to the In Vitro Testing of the Sensitization Potential of Chemicals
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2008; 102(1): 110 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
G. F. Gerberick, J. D. Vassallo, L. M. Foertsch, B. B. Price, J. G. Chaney, and J.-P. Lepoittevin
Quantification of Chemical Peptide Reactivity for Screening Contact Allergens: A Classification Tree Model Approach
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2007; 97(2): 417 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.