Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on July 14, 2004
Toxicological Sciences 2004 81(2):491-501; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh222
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
81/2/491    most recent
kfh222v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Filipsson, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sand, S.
Right arrow Articles by Filipsson, A. F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 81 no. 2 © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved.

Dose-Response Modeling and Benchmark Calculations from Spontaneous Behavior Data on Mice Neonatally Exposed to 2,2',4,4',5-Pentabromodiphenyl Ether

Salomon Sand*,1, Dietrich von Rosen{dagger}, Per Eriksson{ddagger}, Anders Fredriksson{ddagger}, Henrik Viberg{ddagger}, Katarina Victorin* and Agneta Falk Filipsson*

* Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 210, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden; {dagger} Department of Biometry and Informatics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7032, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden; and {ddagger} Department of Environmental Toxicology, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, S-75236 Uppsala, Sweden

Received April 27, 2004; accepted July 7, 2004

In this paper the benchmark dose (BMD) method was introduced for spontaneous behavior data observed in 2-, 5-, and 8-month-old male and female C57Bl mice exposed orally on postnatal day 10 to different doses of 2,2',4,4',5-pentabromodiphenyl ether (PBDE 99). Spontaneous behavior (locomotion, rearing, and total activity) was in the present work quantified in terms of a fractional response defined as the cumulative response after 20 min divided by the cumulative response produced over the whole 1-h test period. The fractional response contains information about the time-response profile (which differs between the treatment groups) and has appropriate statistical characteristics. In the analysis, male and female mice could be characterized by a common dose-response model (i.e., they responded equally to the exposure to PBDE 99). As a primary approach, the BMD was defined as the dose producing a 5 or 10% change in the mean fractional response. According to the Hill model, considering a 10% change the lower bound of the BMD for rearing, locomotion, and total activity was 1.2, 0.85, and 0.31 mg PBDE 99/kg body weight, respectively. A probability-based procedure for BMD modeling was also considered. Using this methodology, the BMD was defined as corresponding to an excess risk of 5 or 10% of falling below cutoff points representing adverse levels of fractional response.

Key Words: spontaneous behavior; dose-response; benchmark dose; health risk assessment.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Toxicol SciHome page
S. Sand, D. von Rosen, K. Victorin, and A. Falk Filipsson
Identification of a Critical Dose Level for Risk Assessment: Developments in Benchmark Dose Analysis of Continuous Endpoints
Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2006; 90(1): 241 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.