Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on August 13, 2004
Toxicological Sciences 2004 82(1):193-206; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh246
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/1/193    most recent
kfh246v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herr, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herr, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 82 no. 1 © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved.

Evaluation of Sensory Evoked Potentials in Long Evans Rats Gestationally Exposed to Mercury (Hg0) Vapor

David W. Herr*,1, Sushmita M. Chanda{dagger},{ddagger}, Jaimie E. Graff*, Stanley S. Barone, Jr*, Robert P. Beliles§ and Daniel L. Morgan{ddagger}

* Neurotoxicology Division, MD B105-05, NHEERL, ORD, U.S. E.P.A., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; {dagger} Roche Palo Alto LLC, Palo Alto, California 94304-1397; {ddagger} Respiratory Toxicology, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709; and § NCEA, ORD, U.S. E.P.A., Washington, District of Columbia 20460

Received July 2, 2004; accepted July 31, 2004

Mercury is known to alter neuronal function and has been shown to cross the placental barrier. These experiments were undertaken to examine if gestational exposure to mercury vapor (Hg0) would result in alterations in sensory neuronal function in adult offspring. Dams were exposed to 0 or 4 mg/m3 Hg0 for 2 h/day from gestational days 6–15. This exposure paradigm has been shown to approximate a maximal tolerated dose of Hg0 for the dams. Between postnatal days 140–168, male and female offspring (one of each gender/dam) were examined using a battery of sensory evoked potentials. Peripheral nerve action potentials, nerve conduction velocity, somatosensory evoked responses (cortical and cerebellar), brainstem auditory evoked responses, pattern evoked potentials, and flash evoked potentials were quantified. Gestational exposure to 4 mg/m3 Hg0 did not significantly alter any of the evoked responses, although there was a suggestion of a decrease in compound nerve action potential (CNAP) amplitudes in male animals for the 3 mA stimulus condition. However, this possible change in CNAP amplitudes was not replicated in a second experiment. All evoked potentials exhibited predictable changes as the stimulus was modified. This shows conclusively that the evoked responses were under stimulus control, and that the study had sufficient statistical power to detect changes of these magnitudes. These results indicate that gestational exposure to 4 mg/m3 Hg0 did not result in changes in responses evoked from peripheral nerves, or the somatosensory, auditory, or visual modalities.

Key Words: mercury vapor; evoked potentials; sensory toxicity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. W. Herr, J. E. Graff, V. C. Moser, K. M. Crofton, P. B. Little, D. L. Morgan, and R. C. Sills
Inhalational Exposure to Carbonyl Sulfide Produces Altered Brainstem Auditory and Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials in Fischer 344N Rats
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2007; 95(1): 118 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.