Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on September 29, 2004
Toxicological Sciences 2004 82(2):458-467; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfh283
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/2/458    most recent
kfh283v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashby, J.
Right arrow Articles by Odum, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashby, J.
Right arrow Articles by Odum, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Toxicological Sciences vol. 82 no. 2 © Society of Toxicology 2004; all rights reserved.

Gene Expression Changes in the Immature Rat Uterus: Effects of Uterotrophic and Sub-Uterotrophic Doses of Bisphenol A

J. Ashby and J. Odum1

Syngenta Central Toxicology Laboratory, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire, SK10 4TJ, U.K.

Received July 28, 2004; accepted September 20, 2004

J. C. Gould et al., 1998, Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 142, 203–214, have reported that administration of 5–150 mg/kg/day BPA to immature rats leads to increases in uterine peroxidase activity and progesterone receptor (PR) protein levels in the absence of a uterotrophic response. These observations are of interest given current concerns regarding the adequacy of the uterotrophic assay to act as a sentinel for the estrogenic activity of chemicals in vivo. Therefore, the uterotrophic activity of BPA to the immature rat has been re-evaluated over the dose range 2 µg/kg–800 mg/kg/day. Expression levels of three estrogen responsive uterine genes were determined using real-time RT-PCR—namely, complement component 3, lipocalin 2, and PR. 18S rRNA and RNA polymerase II large subunit acted as control genes. Observations of gene expression were made 4 h and 72 h after the first of three daily po administrations of BPA. Increases in gene expression were observed over the uterotrophic dose range (~200–800 mg/kg BPA). Over the dose range 2 µg/kg–20 mg/kg BPA there was no uterotrophic response and no increase in gene expression. We conclude that BPA does not produce reproducible changes in gene expression in the uterus of immature rats at dose levels that are not also uterotrophic. Therefore, in the present study, the no effect level for uterotrophic activity for BPA coincided with the no transcriptional effect level for uterine genes.

Key Words: bisphenol A; uterotrophic; gene expression; progesterone receptor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. Martinez-Ferrer, J. M. Iturregui, C. Uwamariya, J. Starkman, A.-R. Sharif-Afshar, K. Suzuki, W. Visedsindh, R. J. Matusik, R. R. Dmochowski, and N. A. Bhowmick
Role of Nicotinic and Estrogen Signaling during Experimental Acute and Chronic Bladder Inflammation
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2008; 172(1): 59 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. M. Naciff, K. A. Hess, G. J. Overmann, S. M. Torontali, G. J. Carr, J. P. Tiesman, L. M. Foertsch, B. D. Richardson, J. E. Martinez, and G. P. Daston
Gene Expression Changes Induced in the Testis by Transplacental Exposure to High and Low Doses of 17{alpha}-Ethynyl Estradiol, Genistein, or Bisphenol A
Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2005; 86(2): 396 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.