Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on August 24, 2005
Toxicological Sciences 2005 88(1):134-141; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi297
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
88/1/134    most recent
kfi297v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sassen, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinsasser, N. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sassen, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinsasser, N. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Genotoxicity of Nicotine in Mini-Organ Cultures of Human Upper Aerodigestive Tract Epithelia

Andrea W. Sassen*, Elmar Richter{dagger}, Marzell P. Semmler*, Ulrich A. Harréus{ddagger}, Fernando Gamarra§ and Norbert H. Kleinsasser*,1

* Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Regensburg, Germany; {dagger} Walther Straub Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany; {ddagger} Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany; and § Internal Medicine-Pneumology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Germany

Received May 2, 2005; accepted August 18, 2005

The direct role of nicotine in tobacco carcinogenesis is still controversial. Recently, DNA damage by nicotine has been demonstrated in isolated human tonsillar tissue cells. Presently, these effects were investigated using mini-organ cultures (MOC) of human nasal epithelia. Intact MOC were repeatedly exposed to 2 and 4 mM nicotine for 1 h on culture days 7, 9, and 11. N-Methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) served as a positive control. DNA damage was examined by Comet assay either directly after exposure or following a 24-h recovery period. Cell viability was not reduced by any treatment. On day 7, 1 h exposure to 2 and 4 mM nicotine caused a significant dose-dependent 3.3- and 5.6-fold increase in DNA damage compared to solvent controls. Although there was no evidence of significant repair within 24 h recovery, DNA damage was not further increased by nicotine on days 9 and 11. After double and triple exposure to 4 mM nicotine a significant reduction in DNA damage following 24 h recovery was observed. In contrast, treatment with MNNG resulted in a highly significant and cumulative increase in DNA migration up to 110-fold compared to controls. During recovery periods, MNNG-induced DNA damage was significantly repaired, leading to a 1.5- to 1.8-fold reduction in DNA migration within 24 h. These results confirm genotoxic effects of nicotine on human nasal epithelia. Further studies are needed to explain the lack of cumulative DNA-damaging effects of nicotine and the absence of significant DNA repair. These studies should include a battery of assays with multiple end points.

Key Words: genotoxicity; nicotine; Comet assay; mini-organ cultures; human epithelia.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
K. H. Ginzel, G. S. Maritz, D. F. Marks, M. Neuberger, Jim. R. Pauly, J. R. Polito, R. Schulte-Hermann, and T. A. Slotkin
Critical Review: Nicotine for the Fetus, the Infant and the Adolescent?
J Health Psychol, March 1, 2007; 12(2): 215 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.