Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on September 21, 2005
Toxicological Sciences 2005 88(2):614-629; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfi327
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
88/2/614    most recent
kfi327v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oberdörster, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elder, A.
Right arrow Articles by Oberdörster, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Effects of Subchronically Inhaled Carbon Black in Three Species. I. Retention Kinetics, Lung Inflammation, and Histopathology

Alison Elder*,1, Robert Gelein*, Jacob N. Finkelstein{dagger}, Kevin E. Driscoll{ddagger}, Jack Harkema§ and Günter Oberdörster*

* Department of Environmental Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642; {dagger} Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14642; {ddagger} Proctor and Gamble Co., Cincinnati, Ohio 45202; and § Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Received July 28, 2005; accepted September 13, 2005

Exposure to high concentrations of carbon black (Cb) produces lung tumors in rats, but not mice or hamsters, presumably due to secondary genotoxic mechanisms involving persistent lung inflammation and injury. We hypothesized that the lung inflammation and injury induced by subchronic inhalation of Cb are more pronounced in rats than in mice and hamsters. Particle retention kinetics, inflammation, and histopathology were examined in female rats, mice, and hamsters exposed for 13 weeks to high surface area Cb (HSCb) at doses chosen to span a no observable adverse effects level (NOAEL) to particle overload (0, 1, 7, 50 mg/m3, nominal concentrations). Rats were also exposed to low surface area Cb (50 mg/m3, nominal; LSCb). Retention and effects measurements were performed immediately after exposure and 3 and 11 months post-exposure; retention was also evaluated after 5 weeks of exposure. Significant decreases in body weight during exposure occurred only in hamsters exposed to high-dose HSCb. Lung weights were increased in high-dose Cb-exposed animals, but this persisted only in rats and mice up to the end of the study period. Equivalent or similar mass burdens were achieved in rats exposed to high-dose HSCb and LSCb, whereas surface area burdens were equivalent for mid-dose HSCb and LSCb. Prolonged retention was found in rats exposed to mid- and high-dose HSCb and to LSCb, but LSCb was cleared faster than HSCb. Retention was also prolonged in mice exposed to mid- and high-dose HSCb, and in hamsters exposed to high-dose HSCb. Lung inflammation and histopathology were more severe and prolonged in rats than in mice and hamsters, and both were similar in rats exposed to mid-dose HSCb and LSCb. The results show that hamsters have the most efficient clearance mechanisms and least severe responses of the three species. The results from rats also show that particle surface area is an important determinant of target tissue dose and, therefore, effects. From these results, a subchronic NOAEL of 1 mg/m3 respirable HSCb (Printex 90) can be assigned to female rats, mice, and hamsters.

Key Words: Carbon black; particle retention; species comparison; particle overload; inflammation; histopathology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
A. K. Bauer and E. A. Rondini
REVIEW PAPER: The Role of Inflammation in Mouse Pulmonary Neoplasia
Vet. Pathol., May 1, 2009; 46(3): 369 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. K. Hamade and C. G. Tankersley
Interstrain variation in cardiac and respiratory adaptation to repeated ozone and particulate matter exposures
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): R1202 - R1215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. W. Card, D. C. Zeldin, J. C. Bonner, and E. R. Nestmann
Pulmonary applications and toxicity of engineered nanoparticles
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): L400 - L411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
G. L. Baker, A. Gupta, M. L. Clark, B. R. Valenzuela, L. M. Staska, S. J. Harbo, J. T. Pierce, and J. A. Dill
Inhalation Toxicity and Lung Toxicokinetics of C60 Fullerene Nanoparticles and Microparticles
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 122 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. Lison and J. Muller
To the Editor
Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2008; 101(1): 179 - 180.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
D. B. Warheit, T. R. Webb, C. M. Sayes, V. L. Colvin, and K. L. Reed
Pulmonary Instillation Studies with Nanoscale TiO2 Rods and Dots in Rats: Toxicity Is not Dependent upon Particle Size and Surface Area
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2006; 91(1): 227 - 236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.