Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BABIUK, C.
Right arrow Articles by DEAN, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BABIUK, C.
Right arrow Articles by DEAN, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 Oxford University Press

research-article

Induction of Ethylenediamine Hypersensitivity in the Guinea Pig and the Development of ELISA and Lymphocyte Blastogenesis Techniques for Its Characterization

CHRISTINE BABIUK1, KENNETH L. HASTINGS and JACK H. DEAN

Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology, Department of Cell Biology Box 12137, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Ethylenediamine (EDA) is reported to be a poorly characterized iatrogenic and occupational contact sensitizer. To better characterize EDA hypersensitivity, a guinea pig model was employed in which the animals were exposed epicutaneously to simulate conditions of human exposure, and selected immune parameters were measured. Induction of hypersensitivity was by the Buehler occluded patch method (6 hr application/day, once a week for 3 consecutive weeks) to 10, 20, 30, or 407% EDA, using either an ethanol or acetone/corn oil vehicle. Fourteen days after the last induction, guinea pigs were challenged by patch application of 2% EDA (nonirritating). The incidence of responders for erythema in the 10% EDA (ethanol) treatment group was 83 and 50% at 24 and 48 hr, respectively. In the 10% EDA (acetone/corn oil) group the corresponding values were 50 and 17%. For 20, 30, and 40% EDA, in either vehicle, the incidence oferythema was 83 to 100%. Severity grades (scale = 0–3) for cutaneous reactions to increasing concentrations of EDA in ethanol ranged from 0.8 to 2.5; those for EDA in acetone/corn oil ranged from 0.6 to 2.8. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed to detect the predominant serum antibodies to EDA, it was shown that guinea pigs treated by patch application did not produce the main allergic antibody lgG specific for EDA. However, intradermal administration of an EDA–guinea pig serum albumin conjugate (EDA–GSA) to guinea pigs presensitized by patch application resulted in antibody production by 39 and 86% of the animals, at the initial and second dosing, respectively. An in vitro blastogenesis assay, using peripheral blood lymphocytes from EDA-sensitized guinea pigs, was developed to identify specific chemical allergens implicated inin vivo sensitization. Maximum tritiated thymidine ([3H]TdR) incorporation by lymphocytes stimulated in vitro with EDA–GSA was observed on Day 7. Optimal antigen concentration for maximum lymphocyte proliferation ranged from 5 to 50 µg/ml, the major variation being attributable to interanimal differences. These results indicate that epicutaneous application of EDA in the guinea pig induces a Type IV delayed hypersensitivity; immunological memory to the hapten is maintained in cultured lymphocytes, suggesting the potential usefulness of the lymphocyte transformation test for in vitro diagnosis of chemically induced hypersensitivity in humans.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.