Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEPASS, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by WEIL, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by DEPASS, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by WEIL, C. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1987 Oxford University Press

research-article

Dermal Oncogenicity Studies on Various Ethyleneamines in Male C3H Mice

LINVAL R. DEPASS1, EDWARD H. FOWLER and CARROL S. WEIL

Bushy Run Research Center, Mellon Institute-Union Carbide Corporation RD. 4, Mellon Road, Export, Pennsylvania 15632

The dermal oncogenic potential" of diethylenetnamine, high purity and commercial grades (DETA-HP and DETA-C), triethylenetetramine (TETA), tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA), and polyamine HPA No. 2 was assessed by applying 25-µ1 aliquots of aqueous solutions to the skin of groups of 50 male C3H/HeJ mice. The concentrations applied were 5.0, 5.0, 5.0, 25.0, and 10.0% by volume for DETA-HP, DETA-C, TETA, TEPA, and HPA No. 2, respectively. Applications were made thrice weekly until the death of the animals. A negative control group received deionized water (solvent) only. All animals were individually housed. No treatment-related skin tumors were observed, nor was there evidence of increased incidence of any internal tumor. Twenty TEPA treated mice had hyperkeratosis and 13 had necrosis of the epidermis, both indicative of skin irritation. Such lesions were absent or occurred very infrequently in the other groups of mice. The mean survival times were 587, 662, 627, 591,601, and 626 days for the DETA-HP, DETA C, TETA, TEPA, HPA No. 2, and water control groups, respectively. In no case was the mortality rate significantly different from that of the controls. The results indicate that none of these compounds was oncogenic under the conditions of these studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.