Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on August 31, 2006
Toxicological Sciences 2006 94(2):261-271; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfl096
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/2/261    most recent
kfl096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kiang, T. K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, T. K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kiang, T. K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, T. K. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Contribution of CYP2C9, CYP2A6, and CYP2B6 to Valproic Acid Metabolism in Hepatic Microsomes from Individuals with the CYP2C9*1/*1 Genotype

Tony K. L. Kiang, Ping C. Ho1, M. Reza Anari2, Vincent Tong3, Frank S. Abbott and Thomas K. H. Chang4

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada

Received June 1, 2006; accepted August 25, 2006

The present study investigated the role of specific human cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in the in vitro metabolism of valproic acid (VPA) by a complementary approach that used individual cDNA-expressed CYP enzymes, chemical inhibitors of specific CYP enzymes, CYP-specific inhibitory monoclonal antibodies (MAbs), individual human hepatic microsomes, and correlational analysis. cDNA-expressed CYP2C9*1, CYP2A6, and CYP2B6 were the most active catalysts of 4-ene-VPA, 4-OH-VPA, and 5-OH-VPA formation. The extent of 4-OH-VPA and 5-OH-VPA formation by CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2C8, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP4A11, CYP4F2, CYP4F3A, and CYP4F3B was only 1–8% of the levels by CYP2C9*1. CYP2A6 was the most active in catalyzing VPA 3-hydroxylation, whereas CYP1A1, CYP2B6, CYP4F2, and CYP4F3B were less active. Correlational analyses of VPA metabolism with CYP enzyme-selective activities suggested a potential role for hepatic microsomal CYP2A6 and CYP2C9. Chemical inhibition experiments with coumarin (CYP2A6 inhibitor), triethylenethiophosphoramide (CYP2B6 inhibitor), and sulfaphenazole (CYP2C9 inhibitor) and immunoinhibition experiments (including combinatorial analysis) with MAb-2A6, MAb-2B6, and MAb-2C9 indicated that the CYP2C9 inhibitors reduced the formation of 4-ene-VPA, 4-OH-VPA, and 5-OH-VPA by 75–80% in a panel of hepatic microsomes from donors with the CYP2C9*1/*1 genotype, whereas the CYP2A6 and CYP2B6 inhibitors had a small effect. Only the CYP2A6 inhibitors reduced VPA 3-hydroxylation (by ~50%). The extent of inhibition correlated with the catalytic capacity of these enzymes in each microsome sample. Overall, our novel findings indicate that in human hepatic microsomes, CYP2C9*1 is the predominant catalyst in the formation of 4-ene-VPA, 4-OH-VPA, and 5-OH-VPA, whereas CYP2A6 contributes partially to 3-OH-VPA formation.

Key Words: cytochrome P450; CYP2A6; CYP2B6; CYP2C9; valproic acid.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. C. Knapp, L. Todesco, K. Beier, L. Terracciano, H. Sagesser, J. Reichen, and S. Krahenbuhl
Toxicity of Valproic Acid in Mice with Decreased Plasma and Tissue Carnitine Stores
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2008; 324(2): 568 - 575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.