Skip Navigation


ToxSci Advance Access originally published online on May 5, 2007
Toxicological Sciences 2007 99(2):403-412; doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfm108
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
99/2/403    most recent
kfm108v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burgoon, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burgoon, L. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Clearing the Standards Landscape: the Semantics of Terminology and their Impact on Toxicogenomics

Lyle D. Burgoon1

Toxicogenomic Informatics and Solutions, LLC, P.O. Box 27482, Lansing, Michigan 48909

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Fax: (517) 882-0080. E-mail: burgoonL{at}txisllc.com.

Received March 12, 2007; accepted May 1, 2007


   Abstract

The emergence of the microarray data standards, especially the Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment (MIAME), has spurred several organizations to develop their own standards for a myriad of technologies, including proteomics and metabolomics. These efforts have facilitated the creation of several large-scale gene expression repositories, including the toxicology-focused Chemical Effects in Biological Systems Knowledgebase at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Recently, efforts have been moved toward developing toxicogenomic data standards (e.g., MIAME-Tox), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency either have developed or are developing regulatory guidance with respect to pharmaco- and toxicogenomics. However, for the toxicology community to be engaged in the process of standards development and approval, there needs to be a more thorough understanding of the terms associated with electronic data sharing and communication, especially with respect to defining the terms "standard," "controlled vocabulary," "object model," "markup language," and "ontology." This review will discuss these terms, especially as they pertain to toxicogenomics, how they relate to one-another, and what current efforts exist that may impact toxicology.

Key Words: toxicogenomics; data standards; object model; controlled vocabulary; markup language; ontology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. R. Williams-Devane, M. A. Wolf, and A. M. Richard
Toward a Public Toxicogenomics Capability for Supporting Predictive Toxicology: Survey of Current Resources and Chemical Indexing of Experiments in GEO and ArrayExpress
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2009; 109(2): 358 - 371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.